Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29366434›Full record

ArticleInfection control and hospital epidemiology2018

Screening for Asymptomatic Clostridium difficile Among Bone Marrow Transplant Patients: A Mixed-Methods Study of Intervention Effectiveness and Feasibility.

Anna K Barker, Benjamin Krasity, Jackson Musuuza, Nasia Safdar

Abstract readComparative StudyEvaluation Study
In one paragraph

Article in Infection control and hospital epidemiology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 26% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 13 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Investigating in-hospital transmission ofJournal of the Association of Medical Microbiology and Infectious Disease Canada = Journal officiel de l'Association pour la microbiologie medicale et l'infectiologie Canada · 2025
    Article
  4. Pathogens (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024
    Review
  5. Estimating the effect of active detection and isolation onInfection control and hospital epidemiology · 2023
    Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Anna K Barker1Department of Population Health Sciences,University of Wisconsin-Madison,Madison,Wisconsin.
Benjamin Krasity2School of Medicine and Public Health,University of Wisconsin-Madison,Madison,Wisconsin.
Jackson Musuuza3William S. Middleton Memorial Veterans Affairs Hospital,Madison,Wisconsin.
Nasia Safdar3William S. Middleton Memorial Veterans Affairs Hospital,Madison,Wisconsin.
University of Wisconsin–Madison · USWilliam S. Middleton Memorial Veterans Hospital · US

Funding

Institutional Clinical and Translational Science AwardUL1TR000427 · NCATS · UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN-MADISON · PI DREZNER, MARC KENNETH · 2012 to 2016
$32.2M
INTEGRATED TRAINING FOR PHYSICIAN-SCIENTISTST32GM008692 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN-MADISON · PI BURKARD, MARK E · 1998 to 2020
$10.3M
Institutional Clinical and Translational Science AwardTL1TR000429 · NCATS · UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN-MADISON · PI DREZNER, MARC KENNETH · 2012 to 2016
$1.5M
NCATS NIH HHS TL1 TR000429NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR000427NIGMS NIH HHS T32 GM008692
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

OBJECTIVE To identify facilitators and barriers to implementation of a Clostridium difficile screening intervention among bone marrow transplant (BMT) patients and to evaluate the clinical effectiveness of the intervention on the rate of hospital-onset C. difficile infection (HO-CDI). DESIGN Before-and-after trial SETTING A 505-bed tertiary-care medical center PARTICIPANTS All 5,357 patients admitted to the BMT and general medicine wards from January 2014 to February 2017 were included in the study. Interview participants included 3 physicians, 4 nurses, and 4 administrators. INTERVENTION All BMT patients were screened within 48 hours of admission. Colonized patients, as defined by a C. difficile-positive polymerase chain reaction (PCR) stool result, were placed under contact precautions for the duration of their hospital stay. METHODS Interview responses were coded according to the Systems Engineering Initiative for Patient Safety conceptual framework. We compared pre- and postintervention HO-CDI rates on BMT and general internal medicine units using time-series analysis. RESULTS Stakeholder engagement, at both the person and organizational level, facilitates standardization and optimization of intervention protocols. While the screening intervention was generally well received, tools and technology were sources of concern. The mean incidence of HO-CDI decreased on the BMT service postintervention (P<.0001). However, the effect of the change in the trend postintervention was not significantly different on BMT compared to the control wards (P=.93). CONCLUSIONS We report the first mixed-methods study to evaluate a C. difficile screening intervention among the BMT population. The positive nature by which the intervention was received by front-line clinical staff, laboratory staff, and administrators is promising for future implementation studies. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 2018;39:177-185.

Indexed as

Attitude of Health PersonnelBone Marrow TransplantationClostridioides difficileClostridium InfectionsCross InfectionFecesHumansInfection ControlInterviews as TopicLength of StayPolymerase Chain ReactionRegression AnalysisTertiary Care CentersWisconsin

Identifiers

PMID29366434
PMCPMC6239859
OpenAlexW2791147944

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.