Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29366419›Full record

Observational studyCurrent pediatric reviews2018

Efficacy of Supplementation with Iron Sulfate Compared to Iron Bisglycinate Chelate in Preterm Infants.

Rossana Bagna, Elena Spada, Raffaela Mazzone, Paola Saracco, Tatiana Boetti, Elena Andrea Cester, Enrico Bertino, Alessandra Coscia

Open access · bronzeAbstract readComparative StudyObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in Current pediatric reviews, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.5field-weighted citation impact, top 18% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 20 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Amino Acid Chelated Iron Versus Ferric Ammonium Citrate on Iron Status in Egyptian Children with Iron Deficiency Anemia: A Randomized Controlled Study.Indian journal of hematology & blood transfusion : an official journal of Indian Society of Hematology and Blood Transfusion · 2025
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Rossana BagnaNeonatology and Neonatal Intensive Care Unit, University Hospital, Citta della Salute e della Scienza, Turin, Italy.
Elena SpadaDepartment of Clinical Sciences and Community Health, University of Milan, Italy.
Raffaela MazzoneSS Haematology and Coagulation, Department of Laboratory Medicine, Citta della Salute e della Scienza, Turin, Italy.
Paola SaraccoSS Paediatric Haematology, University Department of Paediatric Science, Citta della Salute e della Scienza, Turin, Italy.
Tatiana BoettiPaediatrics and Neonatology Unit, Cardinal Massaia Hospital, Asti, Italy.
Elena Andrea CesterNeonatology and Neonatal Intensive Care Unit, University Hospital, Citta della Salute e della Scienza, Turin, Italy.
Enrico BertinoNeonatology and Neonatal Intensive Care Unit, University Hospital, Citta della Salute e della Scienza, Turin, Italy.
Alessandra CosciaNeonatology and Neonatal Intensive Care Unit, University Hospital, Citta della Salute e della Scienza, Turin, Italy.
Azienda Ospedaliera Citta' della Salute e della Scienza di Torino · ITAzienda Sanitaria Locale di Asti · ITUniversity of Milan · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundStrategies to prevent anaemia in preterm infants include drawing fewer blood samples, the use of recombinant human erythropoietin and iron supplementation. Although iron sulfate is the most commonly used pharmaceutical formulation for iron supplementation, there are few studies comparing different iron salts in infants.

objectiveThis is a study of retrospective data comparison of two groups of preterm infants receiving erythropoietin to evaluate the efficacy of iron bisglycinate chelate to iron sulfate. SUBJECTS AND

methodsThree-hundred infants of gestational age ≤32 weeks were enrolled: 225 were supplemented with iron sulfate (3 mg/kg/day) and 75 were supplemented with iron bisglycinate chelate (0.75 mg/kg/day). The effect on erythropoiesis was assessed with a general linear model that estimates the response variables (values for Haemoglobin, Haematocrit, absolute values and percentage Reticulocytes, Reticulocyte Haemoglobin content) based on treatment, time, birth weight, and gestational age.

resultsSupplementation with iron bisglycinate chelate at a dose of 0.75 mg/kg/day demonstrated an efficacy comparable to iron sulfate at a dose of 3 mg/kg/day in both populations of preterm infants. The two cohorts had similar erythropoietic response, without significant differences.

conclusionsThe higher bioavailability of iron bisglycinate chelate resulted in a lower load of elemental iron, a quarter of the dose, and achieved equivalent efficacy compared to iron sulfate. Iron bisglycinate chelate may appear to be an alternative to iron sulfate in the prevention and treatment of preterm newborn anaemia.

Indexed as

Anemia, Iron-DeficiencyDrug Administration ScheduleDrug Therapy, CombinationErythropoietinFemaleFerrous CompoundsHematinicsHumansInfant, NewbornInfant, PrematureInfant, Premature, DiseasesMaleRetrospective StudiesTreatment OutcomeErythropoietinFerrous Compoundsferrous sulfateHematinicsbisglycinate chelatehaemoglobinIron deficiencyiron sulfatePreterm newborn anaemiatreatment.

Identifiers

PMID29366419
PMCPMC6416193
OpenAlexW2784404864

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.