ArticleThe neuroradiology journal2018
Role of time-resolved-CTA in intracranial arteriovenous malformation evaluation at 128-slice CT in comparison with digital subtraction angiography.
Article in The neuroradiology journal, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 16 citations in OpenAlex.
- Reporting of angiographic studies in patients diagnosed with a cerebral arteriovenous malformation: a systematic review.F1000Research · 2023Pooled it
- Is four-dimensional CT angiography as effective as digital subtraction angiography in the detection of the underlying causes of intracerebral haemorrhage: a systematic review.Neuroradiology · 2020Pooled it
- Analysis of the role of perfusion parameters in predicting rupture of brain arteriovenous malformations: a multi-center study.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- Targeted endovascular treatment for ruptured brain arteriovenous malformations.Neurosurgical review · 2020Review
- A cerebral arteriovenous malformation mistakenly diagnosed as dry eye and glaucoma: a case report.BMC ophthalmology · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction The present study aimed to evaluate the accuracy of time-resolved-computed tomographic angiography (TR-CTA) on a 128-slice CT scanner vis-à-vis cerebral digital subtraction angiography (DSA) in defining the morphological and haemodynamic characteristics of cerebral arteriovenous malformation (AVM). Methods Twenty-one patients (age range 10-46, mean 24.8 years) with clinical suspicion of AVM and three patients (age range 23-35, mean 24.3 years) with diagnosed AVM who were on follow-up underwent DSA and TR-CTA, on average 1.5 days apart. Three independent neuroradiologists analysed both studies in a blinded fashion based on the following parameters: AVM location, arterial feeder territories, venous drainage pattern, nidus flow characteristics, venous outflow obstruction, arterial feeder enlargement, external carotid artery feeder, location of aneurysm if any, leptomeningeal and transdural recruitment, neoangiogenesis, and pseudophlebitic pattern. Results The TR-CTA correctly demonstrated AVM in all 21 positive cases. It concordantly detected location (21/21), venous drainage pattern (21/21), nidus flow characteristics (21/21), and the venous outflow obstruction (9/9). However, discordance was seen in the demonstration of the arterial feeder (2/45) ( p = 0.49), arterial enlargement (13/17) ( p = 0.103), external carotid artery feeder (0/1), aneurysmal location (3/5) ( p = 0.40), leptomeningeal recruitment (1/3) ( p = 0.40), neoangiogenesis (0/4) ( p = 0.028) and in the pseudophlebitic pattern (2/5) ( p = 0.167) demonstration. Conclusions The results suggest that TR-CTA can provide the important features of cerebral AVM which are required in patient management.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.