Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29365357›Full record

ArticleLiver transplantation : official publication of the American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases and the International Liver Transplantation Society2018

Intraregional model for end-stage liver disease score variation in liver transplantation: Disparity in our own backyard.

Kristopher P Croome, David D Lee, Justin M Burns, Andrew P Keaveny, C Burcin Taner

Abstract readComparative Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Liver transplantation : official publication of the American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases and the International Liver Transplantation Society, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Gender disparities in transplantation.Current opinion in organ transplantation · 2021
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Heterogeneous Circles for Liver Allocation.Hepatology (Baltimore, Md.) · 2021
    Article
  9. Article
  10. The Changing Landscapes in DCD Liver Transplantation.Current transplantation reports · 2020
    Review
  11. Geographic disparities in liver supply/demand ratio within fixed-distance and fixed-population circles.American journal of transplantation : official journal of the American Society of Transplantation and the American Society of Transplant Surgeons · 2019
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Kristopher P CroomeDepartment of Transplant, Mayo Clinic Florida, Jacksonville, FL.ORCID 0000-0001-7725-703X
David D LeeDepartment of Transplant, Mayo Clinic Florida, Jacksonville, FL.
Justin M BurnsDepartment of Transplant, Mayo Clinic Florida, Jacksonville, FL.
Andrew P KeavenyDepartment of Transplant, Mayo Clinic Florida, Jacksonville, FL.
C Burcin TanerDepartment of Transplant, Mayo Clinic Florida, Jacksonville, FL.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Variation in average Model for End-Stage Liver Disease (MELD) score at liver transplantation (LT) by United Network for Organ Sharing (UNOS) regions is well documented. The present study aimed to investigate MELD variation at the interregional, intraregional, and intra-donation service area (DSA) levels. Patients undergoing LT between 2015 and 2016 were obtained from the UNOS standard analysis and research file. The distribution of allocation MELD score including median, skew, and kurtosis was examined for all transplant programs. Intraregional median allocation MELD varied significantly within all 11 UNOS regions. The largest variation between programs was seen in region 5 (MELD 24.0 versus 38.5) and region 3 (MELD 20.5 versus 32.0). Regions 1, 5, and 9 had the largest proportion of programs with a highly negative skewed MELD score (50%, 57%, and 57%, respectively), whereas regions 3, 6, 10, and 11 did not have any programs with a highly negative skew. MELD score distribution was also examined in programs located in the same DSA, where no barriers exist and theoretically no significant difference in allocation should be observed. The largest DSA variation in median allocation MELD score was seen in NYRT-OP1 LiveOnNY (MELD score variation 11), AZOB-OP1 Donor Network of Arizona (MELD score variation 11), MAOB-OP1 New England Organ Bank (MELD score variation 9), and TXGC-OP1 LifeGift Organ Donation Ctr (MELD score variation 9). In conclusion, the present study demonstrates that this MELD disparity is not only present at the interregional level but can be seen within regions and even within DSAs between programs located as close as several city blocks away. Although organ availability likely accounts for a component of this disparity, the present study suggests that transplant center behavior may also play a significant role. Liver Transplantation 24 488-496 2018 AASLD.

Indexed as

Severity of Illness IndexAdultEnd Stage Liver DiseaseHealthcare DisparitiesHumansLiver TransplantationTime FactorsTissue and Organ ProcurementUnited StatesWaiting Lists

Identifiers

PMID29365357

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.