Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29365157›Full record

ArticleNicotine & tobacco research : official journal of the Society for Research on Nicotine and Tobacco2019

Inferring Smoking Status from User Generated Content in an Online Cessation Community.

Michael S Amato, George D Papandonatos, Sarah Cha, Xi Wang, Kang Zhao, Amy M Cohn, Jennifer L Pearson, Amanda L Graham

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nicotine & tobacco research : official journal of the Society for Research on Nicotine and Tobacco, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Michael S AmatoThe Schroeder Institute for Tobacco Research and Policy Studies at Truth Initiative, Washington, DC.
George D PapandonatosCenter for Statistical Sciences, Brown University, Providence, RI.
Sarah ChaThe Schroeder Institute for Tobacco Research and Policy Studies at Truth Initiative, Washington, DC.
Xi WangSchool of Information, Central University of Finance and Economics, Beijing, China.
Kang ZhaoDepartment of Management Sciences, The University of Iowa, Iowa City, Iowa.
Amy M CohnBattelle Memorial Institute, Arlington, VA.
Jennifer L PearsonSchool of Community Health Sciences, University of Nevada, Reno, NV.
Amanda L GrahamThe Schroeder Institute for Tobacco Research and Policy Studies at Truth Initiative, Washington, DC.

Funding

Viral VectorP30CA086862 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF IOWA · PI Jon C.D. Houtman · 2000 to 2026
$70.0M
Social Dynamics of Substance Use in Online Social Networks for Smoking CessationR01CA192345 · NCI · TRUTH INITIATIVE FOUNDATION · PI GRAHAM, AMANDA L, ZHAO, KANG · 2014 to 2016
$1.4M
NCI NIH HHS R01 CA192345
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: User generated content (UGC) is a valuable but underutilized source of information about individuals who participate in online cessation interventions. This study represents a first effort to passively detect smoking status among members of an online cessation program using UGC. Methods: Secondary data analysis was performed on data from 826 participants in a web-based smoking cessation randomized trial that included an online community. Domain experts from the online community reviewed each post and comment written by participants and attempted to infer the author's smoking status at the time it was written. Inferences from UGC were validated by comparison with self-reported 30-day point prevalence abstinence (PPA). Following validation, the impact of this method was evaluated across all individuals and time points in the study period. Results: Of the 826 participants in the analytic sample, 719 had written at least one post from which content inference was possible. Among participants for whom unambiguous smoking status was inferred during the 30 days preceding their 3-month follow-up survey, concordance with self-report was almost perfect (kappa = 0.94). Posts indicating abstinence tended to be written shortly after enrollment (median = 14 days). Conclusions: Passive inference of smoking status from UGC in online cessation communities is possible and highly reliable for smokers who actively produce content. These results lay the groundwork for further development of observational research tools and intervention innovations. Implications: A proof-of-concept methodology for inferring smoking status from user generated content in online cessation communities is presented and validated. Content inference of smoking status makes a key cessation variable available for use in observational designs. This method provides a powerful tool for researchers interested in online cessation interventions and establishes a foundation for larger scale application via machine learning.

Indexed as

InternetOnline Social NetworkingSurveys and QuestionnairesAdultFemaleHealth BehaviorHumansMaleMiddle AgedSmoking CessationTobacco Smoking

Identifiers

PMID29365157
PMCPMC6329402

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.