ArticleAccounts of chemical research2018
Keeping Track of the Electrons.
Article in Accounts of chemical research, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Overcoming the Naphthyl Requirement in Stereospecific Cross-Couplings to Form Quaternary Stereocenters.Journal of the American Chemical Society · 2021Article
- Nickel-Catalyzed, Stereospecific C-C and C-B Cross-Couplings via C-N and C-O Bond Activation.ACS catalysis · 2021Article
- Activation of C-O and C-N Bonds Using Non-Precious-Metal Catalysis.ACS catalysis · 2020Article
- A Radical Approach to Anionic Chemistry: Synthesis of Ketones, Alcohols, and Amines.Journal of the American Chemical Society · 2019Article
- A Unified Explanation for Chemoselectivity and Stereospecificity of Ni-Catalyzed Kumada and Cross-Electrophile Coupling Reactions of Benzylic Ethers: A Combined Computational and Experimental Study.Journal of the American Chemical Society · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Mechanistic investigation and new reaction development are intertwined. This interdependence presents challenges and opportunities in development of all transformations, particularly for those that employ base metal catalysts. In comparison to precious metal counterparts, these catalysts yield less easily to mechanistic analysis. However, base metal catalysts can provide new modes of reactivity and opportunities for discovery. In this Commentary, we highlight a developing field: nickel-catalyzed stereoselective alkyl cross-coupling reactions. While key features of the relevant catalytic cycles remain ambiguous, chemical intuition and key mechanistic experiments have provided the stepping stones for discovery of stereoselective transformations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.