Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29364285›Full record

ReviewNature2018

From haematopoietic stem cells to complex differentiation landscapes.

Elisa Laurenti, Berthold Göttgens

Open access · greenAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Nature, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 500 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
500citing papers in PubMed
59.6field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

500 citing papers in PubMed, 815 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Hematopoietic Stem Cell Metabolism during Stress and Aging.Advances in geriatric medicine and research · 2026
    Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Diagnostic Concordance and Superiority of Flow Cytometry Over Immunohistochemistry in Acute Leukemia Immunophenotyping: A Single-Center Study.Medical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research · 2026
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article

440 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Elisa LaurentiDepartment of Haematology and Wellcome and MRC Cambridge Stem Cell Institute, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.
Berthold GöttgensDepartment of Haematology and Wellcome and MRC Cambridge Stem Cell Institute, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.
Wellcome/MRC Cambridge Stem Cell Institute · GB

Funding

VISION: ValIdated Systematic IntegratiON of epigenomic dataR24DK106766 · NIDDK · PENNSYLVANIA STATE UNIVERSITY, THE · PI BLOBEL, GERD A, BODINE, DAVID M. · 2016 to 2020
$6.2M
Cancer Research UK 21762Medical Research Council G0900951Medical Research Council MC_PC_12009Medical Research Council MC_PC_16040Medical Research Council MR/M008975/1NIDDK NIH HHS R24 DK106766Wellcome Trust
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The development of mature blood cells from haematopoietic stem cells has long served as a model for stem-cell research, with the haematopoietic differentiation tree being widely used as a model for the maintenance of hierarchically organized tissues. Recent results and new technologies have challenged the demarcations between stem and progenitor cell populations, the timing of cell-fate choices and the contribution of stem and multipotent progenitor cells to the maintenance of steady-state blood production. These evolving views of haematopoiesis have broad implications for our understanding of the functions of adult stem cells, as well as the development of new therapies for malignant and non-malignant haematopoietic diseases.

Indexed as

HematopoiesisAdult Stem CellsAnimalsCell CycleCell LineageCell Self RenewalGene Expression ProfilingHematologic DiseasesHematopoietic Stem CellsHumansMultipotent Stem CellsSingle-Cell Analysis

Identifiers

PMID29364285
PMCPMC6555401
OpenAlexW2784395700

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.