Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29364245›Full record

ArticleJournal of visualized experiments : JoVE2018

Microscopy Based Methods for the Assessment of Epithelial Cell Migration During In Vitro Wound Healing.

Sergio Liarte, Ángel Bernabé-García, David Armero-Barranco, Francisco José Nicolás

Open access · greenAbstract readVideo-Audio Media
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of visualized experiments : JoVE, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
0.7field-weighted citation impact, top 27% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 14 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Perinatal derivatives: How to best characterize their multimodal functionsFrontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2022
    Review
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. In vitro cell migration quantification method for scratch assays.Journal of the Royal Society, Interface · 2019
    Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Sergio LiarteLaboratorio de Oncología Molecular y TGF-β, IMIB-Arrixaca.
Ángel Bernabé-GarcíaLaboratorio de Oncología Molecular y TGF-β, IMIB-Arrixaca.
David Armero-BarrancoDepartamento de Enfermería, Facultad Enfermería, Universidad de Murcia.
Francisco José NicolásLaboratorio de Oncología Molecular y TGF-β, IMIB-Arrixaca; franciscoj.nicolas2@carm.es.
Universidad de Murcia · ES

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cell migration is a mandatory aspect for wound healing. Creating artificial wounds on research animal models often results in costly and complicated experimental procedures, while potentially lacking in precision. In vitro culture of epithelial cell lines provides a suitable platform for researching the cell migratory behavior in wound healing and the impact of treatments on these cells. The physiology of epithelial cells is often studied in non-confluent conditions; however, this approach may not resemble natural wound healing conditions. Disrupting the epithelium integrity by mechanical means generates a realistic model, but may impede the application of molecular techniques. Consequently, microscopy based techniques are optimal for studying epithelial cell migration in vitro. Here we detail two specific methods, the artificial wound scratch assay and the artificial migration front assay, that can obtain quantitative and qualitative data, respectively, on the migratory performance of epithelial cells.

Indexed as

Cell Migration AssaysCell MovementEpithelial CellsHumansKeratinocytesMicroscopyWound Healing

Identifiers

PMID29364245
PMCPMC5908412
OpenAlexW2782113189

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.