Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29364209›Full record

ArticleJournal of visualized experiments : JoVE2017

Dispersion of Nanomaterials in Aqueous Media: Towards Protocol Optimization.

Inder Kaur, Laura-Jayne Ellis, Isabella Romer, Ratna Tantra, Marie Carriere, Soline Allard, Martine Mayne-L'Hermite, Caterina Minelli, Wolfgang Unger, Annegret Potthoff and 2 more

Abstract readVideo-Audio Media
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of visualized experiments : JoVE, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Inder KaurSchool of Geography, Earth and Environmental Sciences, University of Birmingham; I.P.Kaur@bham.ac.uk.
Laura-Jayne EllisSchool of Geography, Earth and Environmental Sciences, University of Birmingham.
Isabella RomerSchool of Geography, Earth and Environmental Sciences, University of Birmingham.
Ratna TantraAnalytical Science, National Physical Laboratory.
Marie CarriereINAC-LCIB, Université Grenoble Alpes; CEA, INAC-SyMMES.
Soline AllardNIMBE, CEA, CNRS, Université Paris-Saclay, CEA Saclay.
Martine Mayne-L'HermiteNIMBE, CEA, CNRS, Université Paris-Saclay, CEA Saclay.
Caterina MinelliChemical, Medical and Environmental Science, National Physical Laboratory.
Wolfgang UngerBAM Division 6.1 'Surface Analysis and Interfacial Chemistry', BAM Federal Institute for Materials Research and Testing.
Annegret PotthoffFraunhofer Institute for Ceramic Technologies and Systems.
Steffi RadesBAM Division 6.1 'Surface Analysis and Interfacial Chemistry', BAM Federal Institute for Materials Research and Testing.
Eugenia Valsami-JonesSchool of Geography, Earth and Environmental Sciences, University of Birmingham; e.valsamijones@bham.ac.uk.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The sonication process is commonly used for de-agglomerating and dispersing nanomaterials in aqueous based media, necessary to improve homogeneity and stability of the suspension. In this study, a systematic step-wise approach is carried out to identify optimal sonication conditions in order to achieve a stable dispersion. This approach has been adopted and shown to be suitable for several nanomaterials (cerium oxide, zinc oxide, and carbon nanotubes) dispersed in deionized (DI) water. However, with any change in either the nanomaterial type or dispersing medium, there needs to be optimization of the basic protocol by adjusting various factors such as sonication time, power, and sonicator type as well as temperature rise during the process. The approach records the dispersion process in detail. This is necessary to identify the time points as well as other above-mentioned conditions during the sonication process in which there may be undesirable changes, such as damage to the particle surface thus affecting surface properties. Our goal is to offer a harmonized approach that can control the quality of the final, produced dispersion. Such a guideline is instrumental in ensuring dispersion quality repeatability in the nanoscience community, particularly in the field of nanotoxicology.

Indexed as

NanostructuresWaterWater

Identifiers

PMID29364209
PMCPMC5908381

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.