Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29364073›Full record

ArticleJournal of neurophysiology2018

Amplitude modulation coding in awake mice and squirrel monkeys.

Nerissa E G Hoglen, Phillip Larimer, Elizabeth A K Phillips, Brian J Malone, Andrea R Hasenstaub

Open access · bronzeAbstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of neurophysiology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
25citing papers in PubMed
1.8field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

25 citing papers in PubMed, 33 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Movement-Related Modulation in Mouse Auditory Cortex Is Widespread Yet Locally Diverse.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2024
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. A Redundant Cortical Code for Speech Envelope.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2023
    Article
  17. Article
  18. An Emergent Population Code in Primary Auditory Cortex Supports Selective Attention to Spectral and Temporal Sound Features.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2021
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Nerissa E G HoglenCenter for Integrative Neuroscience, University of California , San Francisco, California.ORCID 0000-0002-4841-4275
Phillip LarimerCenter for Integrative Neuroscience, University of California , San Francisco, California.ORCID 0000-0001-5276-5732
Elizabeth A K PhillipsCenter for Integrative Neuroscience, University of California , San Francisco, California.
Brian J MaloneDepartment of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, University of California , San Francisco, California.
Andrea R HasenstaubCenter for Integrative Neuroscience, University of California , San Francisco, California.ORCID 0000-0003-3998-5073
University of California, San Francisco · US

Funding

NINDS Research Education Programs for Residents and Fellows in Neurology, Neurosurgery, Neuropathology, Neuroradiology and Emergency Medicine (R25)R25NS070680 · NINDS · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO · PI JOSEPHSON, SCOTT ANDREW · 2010 to 2023
$6.8M
Dynamic regulation of auditory context processing by cortical inhibitionR01DC014101 · NIDCD · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO · PI HASENSTAUB, ANDREA RAYNE · 2014 to 2018
$1.9M
Nonlinear dynamics of complex sound processing in auditory cortexR01DC011843 · NIDCD · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO · PI MALONE, BRIAN J. · 2012 to 2016
$1.8M
NIDCD NIH HHS R01 DC011843NIDCD NIH HHS R01 DC014101NINDS NIH HHS R25 NS070680
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Both mice and primates are used to model the human auditory system. The primate order possesses unique cortical specializations that govern auditory processing. Given the power of molecular and genetic tools available in the mouse model, it is essential to understand the similarities and differences in auditory cortical processing between mice and primates. To address this issue, we directly compared temporal encoding properties of neurons in the auditory cortex of awake mice and awake squirrel monkeys (SQMs). Stimuli were drawn from a sinusoidal amplitude modulation (SAM) paradigm, which has been used previously both to characterize temporal precision and to model the envelopes of natural sounds. Neural responses were analyzed with linear template-based decoders. In both species, spike timing information supported better modulation frequency discrimination than rate information, and multiunit responses generally supported more accurate discrimination than single-unit responses from the same site. However, cortical responses in SQMs supported better discrimination overall, reflecting superior temporal precision and greater rate modulation relative to the spontaneous baseline and suggesting that spiking activity in mouse cortex was less strictly regimented by incoming acoustic information. The quantitative differences we observed between SQM and mouse cortex support the idea that SQMs offer advantages for modeling precise responses to fast envelope dynamics relevant to human auditory processing. Nevertheless, our results indicate that cortical temporal processing is qualitatively similar in mice and SQMs and thus recommend the mouse model for mechanistic questions, such as development and circuit function, where its substantial methodological advantages can be exploited. NEW & NOTEWORTHY To understand the advantages of different model organisms, it is necessary to directly compare sensory responses across species. Contrasting temporal processing in auditory cortex of awake squirrel monkeys and mice, with parametrically matched amplitude-modulated tone stimuli, reveals a similar role of timing information in stimulus encoding. However, disparities in response precision and strength suggest that anatomical and biophysical differences between squirrel monkeys and mice produce quantitative but not qualitative differences in processing strategy.

Indexed as

AnimalsAuditory CortexAuditory PerceptionElectroencephalographyFemaleMaleMiceModels, AnimalNeuronsSaimiriSpecies SpecificityTime Perceptionamplitude modulationauditory cortexspecies comparisontemporal processing

Identifiers

PMID29364073
PMCPMC6008086
OpenAlexW2784569898

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.