Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29364002›Full record

ArticleThe European journal of general practice2018

Cross-sectional multicentre study on the cohort of all the French junior lecturers in general practice.

Marie Barais, Catherine Laporte, Matthieu Schuers, Olivier Saint-Lary, Paul Frappé, Clarisse Dibao-Dina, David Darmon, Tiphanie Bouchez, Julien Gelly

Abstract readMulticenter Study
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in The European journal of general practice, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Small Private Online Course in Teaching Oncology-Feedback After 1 Year: What Lessons?Journal of cancer education : the official journal of the American Association for Cancer Education · 2021
    Article
  3. Observational
  4. Observational
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Marie Baraisa EA SPURBO, Department of General Practice , Université de Bretagne Occidentale , Brest , France.
Catherine Laporteb Department of General Medicine, Faculty of Medicine , UFR Medecine , Clermont-Ferrand , France.
Matthieu Schuersc Department of General Practice, Department of Biomedical Informatics , Rouen University, Rouen University Hospital, LITIS EA 4108, Normandie University , Rouen , France.
Olivier Saint-Laryd Faculty of Health Sciences Simone Veil, Department of Family Medicine , Université Versailles Saint-Quentin en Yvelines , Montigny le Bretonneux , France.
Paul Frappéf Department of General Practice , University of Saint-Etienne , Saint-Etienne , France.
Clarisse Dibao-Dinag Department of General Practice , François Rabelais Tours University , Tours , France.
David Darmonh Department of Education and Research in General Practice , Nice Sophia-Antipolis University , Nice , France.
Tiphanie Bouchezh Department of Education and Research in General Practice , Nice Sophia-Antipolis University , Nice , France.
Julien Gellyi Department of General Practice , Paris Diderot University, Inserm, IAME, UMR 1137, Paris Diderot University , Paris , France.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundGeneral practice became an academic discipline quite recently in many western countries. In France, junior lecturer work is specified in a three-part mandate: medical work in general practice, teaching in the university, and research. Since 2007, 130 junior lecturers have been appointed in general practice. The aim of the creation of junior lecturer status was to align general practice with other specialties and to develop research and education in primary care.

objectivesTo describe the healthcare, teaching and research undertaken by junior lecturers in general practice, practising in October 2014.

methodsA cross-sectional multicentre study using an online self-administered questionnaire on the cohort composed of all the junior lecturers in general practice with open questions and the qualitative analysis of written verbatim accounts.

resultsOf the 95 junior lecturers practising at the date of the study, 75 (79%) responded; average age 32 years; gender ratio (F/M) 2.4:1. They spent five, two and three half-days per week respectively in healthcare, teaching and research. The healthcare activity was predominantly carried out in the community (73%). Thirty-nine per cent worked as part of a multi-professional team taking on 50 consultations per week. Most of the educational work involved lecturing and mentoring students specializing in general practice (median 86 hours per year). Research output increased during the fellowship. Research topics were varied and relevant to the disciplinary field.

conclusionDuring the fellowship, the balancing, and even the reinforcement, of healthcare and research contributions were accompanied by a significant investment in educational provision.

Indexed as

Faculty, MedicalGeneral PracticeWorkloadAdultCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleFranceHumansMaleSurveys and Questionnairesdelivery of healthcareGeneral practiceresearchteaching

Identifiers

PMID29364002
PMCPMC5795763

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.