Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29363843›Full record

ArticleThe European journal of neuroscience2018

What does scalp electroencephalogram coherence tell us about long-range cortical networks?

Adam C Snyder, Deepa Issar, Matthew A Smith

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The European journal of neuroscience, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
1.8field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 24 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Distinct Sources of Variability Affect Eye Movement Preparation.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2019
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Adam C SnyderDepartment of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-1794-035X
Deepa IssarDepartment of Bioengineering, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.
Matthew A SmithDepartment of Ophthalmology, Eye and Ear Institute, University of Pittsburgh, 203 Lothrop St., 9th Fl., Pittsburgh, PA, 15213, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-1192-9942
University of Pittsburgh · US

Funding

Virus Production and Manipulation of Protein/Gene Expression ModuleP30EY008098 · NEI · UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH AT PITTSBURGH · PI Marlene Behrmann · 1989 to 2026
$17.8M
Interdiscplinary Training in Computational NeuroscienceR90DA023426 · NIDA · CARNEGIE-MELLON UNIVERSITY · PI KASS, ROBERT E, RUBIN, JONATHAN E. · 2006 to 2020
$4.5M
Slow time scale fluctuations in neurons and behaviorR01MH128393 · NIMH · CARNEGIE-MELLON UNIVERSITY · PI MATTHEW A SMITH · 2022 to 2026
$2.2M
Dynamic Mechanisms of active vision in prefrontal cortexR01EY022928 · NEI · UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH AT PITTSBURGH · PI SMITH, MATTHEW A · 2014 to 2018
$1.9M
CRCNS: Interhemispheric coordination for memory and actionR01NS147766 · NINDS · CARNEGIE-MELLON UNIVERSITY · PI Joseph Patrick Mayo, MATTHEW A SMITH · 2025 to 2026
$750k
High-dimensional analysis of selective visual attention mechanismsR00EY025768 · NEI · UNIVERSITY OF ROCHESTER · PI SNYDER, ADAM CHRISTOPHER · 2018 to 2020
$744k
Identifying selective visual attention mechanisms through high-dimensional analysis.K99EY025768 · NEI · CARNEGIE-MELLON UNIVERSITY · PI SNYDER, ADAM CHRISTOPHER · 2015 to 2016
$196k
NEI NIH HHS K99 EY025768NEI NIH HHS P30 EY008098NEI NIH HHS R00 EY025768NEI NIH HHS R01 EY022928NIDA NIH HHS R90 DA023426NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH128393NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS147766
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Long-range interactions between cortical areas are undoubtedly a key to the computational power of the brain. For healthy human subjects, the premier method for measuring brain activity on fast timescales is electroencephalography (EEG), and coherence between EEG signals is often used to assay functional connectivity between different brain regions. However, the nature of the underlying brain activity that is reflected in EEG coherence is currently the realm of speculation, because seldom have EEG signals been recorded simultaneously with intracranial recordings near cell bodies in multiple brain areas. Here, we take the early steps towards narrowing this gap in our understanding of EEG coherence by measuring local field potentials with microelectrode arrays in two brain areas (extrastriate visual area V4 and dorsolateral prefrontal cortex) simultaneously with EEG at the nearby scalp in rhesus macaque monkeys. Although we found inter-area coherence at both scales of measurement, we did not find that scalp-level coherence was reliably related to coherence between brain areas measured intracranially on a trial-to-trial basis, despite that scalp-level EEG was related to other important features of neural oscillations, such as trial-to-trial variability in overall amplitudes. This suggests that caution must be exercised when interpreting EEG coherence effects, and new theories devised about what aspects of neural activity long-range coherence in the EEG reflects.

Indexed as

Brain MappingElectroencephalographyAnimalsArtifactsBrainHaplorhiniMacaca mulattaMicroelectrodesNerve NetPrefrontal CortexScalpcoherenceconnectivityelectroencephalogramlocal field potentialmonkey

Identifiers

PMID29363843
PMCPMC6497452
OpenAlexW2792900774

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.