Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29363625›Full record

ArticleJournal of neural engineering2018

Rapid calibration of an intracortical brain-computer interface for people with tetraplegia.

David M Brandman, Tommy Hosman, Jad Saab, Michael C Burkhart, Benjamin E Shanahan, John G Ciancibello, Anish A Sarma, Daniel J Milstein, Carlos E Vargas-Irwin, Brian Franco and 20 more

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of neural engineering, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT00912041 (BrainGate2), which is not on this map. Cited by 63 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
63citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT00912041 narecruitingnot on this map

BrainGate2: Feasibility Study of an Intracortical Neural Interface System for Persons With Tetraplegia

TypeinterventionalSponsorLeigh R. Hochberg, MD, PhD.Ran2009 to 2038Enrolled27ConditionsTetraplegia, Spinal Cord Injuries, Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis, Brain Stem InfarctionsArmsPlacement of the BrainGate2 sensor(s) into the motor-related cortex
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

63 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. [Neuroprosthetics].Chirurgie (Heidelberg, Germany) · 2026
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

3 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

30 authors.

David M BrandmanNeuroscience Graduate Program, Brown University, Providence, RI, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0003-3224-7019
Tommy HosmanSchool of Engineering, Brown University, Providence, RI, United States of America.
Jad SaabSchool of Engineering, Brown University, Providence, RI, United States of America.
Michael C BurkhartDivision of Applied Mathematics, Brown University, Providence, RI, United States of America.
Benjamin E ShanahanDepartment of Neuroscience, Brown University, Providence, RI, United States of America.
John G CiancibelloBiomedical Engineering, Brown University, Providence, RI, United States of America.
Anish A SarmaBrown Institute for Brain Science, Brown University, Providence, RI, United States of America.
Daniel J MilsteinDepartment of Computer Science, Brown University, Providence, RI, United States of America.
Carlos E Vargas-IrwinDepartment of Neuroscience, Brown University, Providence, RI, United States of America.
Brian FrancoCenter for Neurotechnology and Neurorecovery, Neurology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, United States of America.
Jessica KelemenCenter for Neurotechnology and Neurorecovery, Neurology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, United States of America.
Christine BlabeDepartment of Neurosurgery, Stanford University, Stanford, Stanford, CA, United States of America.
Brian A MurphyBiomedical Engineering, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH, United States of America.
Daniel R YoungBiomedical Engineering, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH, United States of America.
Francis R WillettBiomedical Engineering, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0002-2652-8511
Chethan PandarinathDepartment of Neurosurgery, Stanford University, Stanford, Stanford, CA, United States of America.
Sergey D StaviskyDepartment of Neurosurgery, Stanford University, Stanford, Stanford, CA, United States of America.
Robert F KirschBiomedical Engineering, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH, United States of America.
Benjamin L WalterLouis Stokes Cleveland Department of Veterans Affairs Medical Center, FES Center, Rehabilitation R&D Service, Cleveland, OH, United States of America.
A Bolu AjiboyeBiomedical Engineering, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH, United States of America.
Sydney S CashCenter for Neurotechnology and Neurorecovery, Neurology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, United States of America.
Emad N EskandarNeurosurgery, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, United States of America.
Jonathan P MillerLouis Stokes Cleveland Department of Veterans Affairs Medical Center, FES Center, Rehabilitation R&D Service, Cleveland, OH, United States of America.
Jennifer A SweetLouis Stokes Cleveland Department of Veterans Affairs Medical Center, FES Center, Rehabilitation R&D Service, Cleveland, OH, United States of America.
Krishna V ShenoyDepartment of Electrical Engineering, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, United States of America.
Jaimie M HendersonDepartment of Neurosurgery, Stanford University, Stanford, Stanford, CA, United States of America.
Beata JarosiewiczDepartment of Neuroscience, Brown University, Providence, RI, United States of America.
Matthew T HarrisonDivision of Applied Mathematics, Brown University, Providence, RI, United States of America.
John D SimeralBrown Institute for Brain Science, Brown University, Providence, RI, United States of America.
Leigh R HochbergBrown Institute for Brain Science, Brown University, Providence, RI, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0003-0261-2273

Funding

Engaging new cognitive and motor signals to improve communication prosthesesR01DC014034 · NIDCD · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI JAIMIE M HENDERSON · 2015 to 2026
$8.2M
Restoring Communication with an Intracortical Neural Interface SystemR01DC009899 · NIDCD · MASSACHUSETTS GENERAL HOSPITAL · PI HOCHBERG, LEIGH R · 2009 to 2017
$7.0M
Integrated Neural Engineering and Rehabilitation Training ProgramT32EB004314 · NIBIB · CASE WESTERN RESERVE UNIVERSITY · PI Jeffrey R Capadona, Robert F. Kirsch · 2004 to 2026
$6.1M
Intracortical control of FES-restored arm and hand function in people with SCIR01HD077220 · NICHD · CASE WESTERN RESERVE UNIVERSITY · PI KIRSCH, ROBERT F. · 2014 to 2017
$1.7M
Mobile Signal Processing System for Broadband Neural DecodingI01RX001155 · VA · PROVIDENCE VA MEDICAL CENTER · PI SIMERAL, JOHN DAVID · 2014 to 2018
–
BrainGate: Robust Neural Decoding for Veterans with ALSI01RX002295 · VA · PROVIDENCE VA MEDICAL CENTER · PI HOCHBERG, LEIGH R · 2017 to 2025
–
NIBIB NIH HHS T32 EB004314NICHD NIH HHS R01 HD077220NIDCD NIH HHS R01 DC009899NIDCD NIH HHS R01 DC014034RRD VA A6779-IRRD VA B6453-RRRD VA I01 RX001155RRD VA I01 RX002295
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveBrain-computer interfaces (BCIs) can enable individuals with tetraplegia to communicate and control external devices. Though much progress has been made in improving the speed and robustness of neural control provided by intracortical BCIs, little research has been devoted to minimizing the amount of time spent on decoder calibration. APPROACH: We investigated the amount of time users needed to calibrate decoders and achieve performance saturation using two markedly different decoding algorithms: the steady-state Kalman filter, and a novel technique using Gaussian process regression (GP-DKF). MAIN

resultsThree people with tetraplegia gained rapid closed-loop neural cursor control and peak, plateaued decoder performance within 3 min of initializing calibration. We also show that a BCI-naïve user (T5) was able to rapidly attain closed-loop neural cursor control with the GP-DKF using self-selected movement imagery on his first-ever day of closed-loop BCI use, acquiring a target 37 s after initiating calibration. SIGNIFICANCE: These results demonstrate the potential for an intracortical BCI to be used immediately after deployment by people with paralysis, without the need for user learning or extensive system calibration.

Indexed as

Brain-Computer InterfacesImplantable NeurostimulatorsAdultCalibrationFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedMotor CortexQuadriplegiaTime Factors

Identifiers

PMID29363625
PMCPMC5823702

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.