Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29363598›Full record

ArticleProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America2018

Focal versus distributed temporal cortex activity for speech sound category assignment.

Sophie Bouton, Valérian Chambon, Rémi Tyrand, Adrian G Guggisberg, Margitta Seeck, Sami Karkar, Dimitri van de Ville, Anne-Lise Giraud

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Categorical Encoding of Vowels in Primary Auditory Cortex.Cerebral cortex (New York, N.Y. : 1991) · 2020
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Low-Frequency Oscillations Code Speech during Verbal Working Memory.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2019
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Sophie BoutonDepartment of Fundamental Neuroscience, Biotech Campus, University of Geneva,1202 Geneva, Switzerland; sophie.l.bouton@gmail.com.
Valérian ChambonDepartment of Fundamental Neuroscience, Biotech Campus, University of Geneva,1202 Geneva, Switzerland.
Rémi TyrandDepartment of Fundamental Neuroscience, Biotech Campus, University of Geneva,1202 Geneva, Switzerland.
Adrian G GuggisbergDepartment of Clinical Neuroscience, University of Geneva - Geneva University Hospitals, 1205 Geneva, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0001-7178-7793
Margitta SeeckDepartment of Clinical Neuroscience, University of Geneva - Geneva University Hospitals, 1205 Geneva, Switzerland.
Sami KarkarLaboratoire de Tribologie et Dynamique des Systèmes, École Centrale de Lyon, 69134 Ecully, France.
Dimitri van de VilleCenter for Neuroprosthetics, Biotech Campus, Swiss Federal Institute of Technology, 1202 Geneva, Switzerland.
Anne-Lise GiraudDepartment of Fundamental Neuroscience, Biotech Campus, University of Geneva,1202 Geneva, Switzerland.

Funding

European Research Council 260347
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Percepts and words can be decoded from distributed neural activity measures. However, the existence of widespread representations might conflict with the more classical notions of hierarchical processing and efficient coding, which are especially relevant in speech processing. Using fMRI and magnetoencephalography during syllable identification, we show that sensory and decisional activity colocalize to a restricted part of the posterior superior temporal gyrus (pSTG). Next, using intracortical recordings, we demonstrate that early and focal neural activity in this region distinguishes correct from incorrect decisions and can be machine-decoded to classify syllables. Crucially, significant machine decoding was possible from neuronal activity sampled across different regions of the temporal and frontal lobes, despite weak or absent sensory or decision-related responses. These findings show that speech-sound categorization relies on an efficient readout of focal pSTG neural activity, while more distributed activity patterns, although classifiable by machine learning, instead reflect collateral processes of sensory perception and decision.

Indexed as

PhoneticsAcoustic StimulationAdultAgedBrain MappingCase-Control StudiesEpilepsyFemaleHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingMagnetoencephalographyMaleSpeech PerceptionTemporal LobeYoung Adultcategorical perceptiondecodingencodingmultivariate pattern analysisspeech sounds

Identifiers

PMID29363598
PMCPMC5819402

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.