The founding of

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

1. A century of exercise physiology: key concepts in muscle cell volume regulation.European journal of applied physiology · 2022
   Review
2. From marginal to essential: the golden thread between nutrient sensing, medium composition and Plasmodium vivax maturation in in vitro culture.Malaria journal · 2019
   Review
3. The lipid bilayer membrane and its protein constituents.The Journal of general physiology · 2018
   Review
4. Inhibition of hyperpolarization-activated cyclic nucleotide-gated channels by β-blocker carvedilol.British journal of pharmacology · 2018
   Article
5. Carriers, exchangers, and cotransporters in the first 100 years of theThe Journal of general physiology · 2018
   Review

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

Authors and funding

1 author.

Funding

Abstract

Indexed as