Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29363427›Full record

ArticleBMC genomics2018

GT-WGS: an efficient and economic tool for large-scale WGS analyses based on the AWS cloud service.

Yiqi Wang, Gen Li, Mark Ma, Fazhong He, Zhuo Song, Wei Zhang, Chengkun Wu

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC genomics, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Veterinary Clinics as Reservoirs forAntibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025
    Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. A bioinformatics potpourri.BMC genomics · 2018
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Yiqi WangSchool of Computer Science, National University of Defense Technology, Changsha, 410000, China.
Gen LiGenetalks Biotech. Co., Ltd, Beijing, 100000, China.
Mark MaGenetalks Biotech. Co., Ltd, Beijing, 100000, China.
Fazhong HeDepartment of Clinical Pharmacology, Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha, 410000, China.
Zhuo SongGenetalks Biotech. Co., Ltd, Beijing, 100000, China. zhuosong@gmail.com.
Wei ZhangDepartment of Clinical Pharmacology, Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha, 410000, China. yjsd2003@163.com.
Chengkun WuSchool of Computer Science, National University of Defense Technology, Changsha, 410000, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundWhole-genome sequencing (WGS) plays an increasingly important role in clinical practice and public health. Due to the big data size, WGS data analysis is usually compute-intensive and IO-intensive. Currently it usually takes 30 to 40 h to finish a 50× WGS analysis task, which is far from the ideal speed required by the industry. Furthermore, the high-end infrastructure required by WGS computing is costly in terms of time and money. In this paper, we aim to improve the time efficiency of WGS analysis and minimize the cost by elastic cloud computing.

resultsWe developed a distributed system, GT-WGS, for large-scale WGS analyses utilizing the Amazon Web Services (AWS). Our system won the first prize on the Wind and Cloud challenge held by Genomics and Cloud Technology Alliance conference (GCTA) committee. The system makes full use of the dynamic pricing mechanism of AWS. We evaluate the performance of GT-WGS with a 55× WGS dataset (400GB fastq) provided by the GCTA 2017 competition. In the best case, it only took 18.4 min to finish the analysis and the AWS cost of the whole process is only 16.5 US dollars. The accuracy of GT-WGS is 99.9% consistent with that of the Genome Analysis Toolkit (GATK) best practice. We also evaluated the performance of GT-WGS performance on a real-world dataset provided by the XiangYa hospital, which consists of 5× whole-genome dataset with 500 samples, and on average GT-WGS managed to finish one 5× WGS analysis task in 2.4 min at a cost of $3.6.

conclusionsWGS is already playing an important role in guiding therapeutic intervention. However, its application is limited by the time cost and computing cost. GT-WGS excelled as an efficient and affordable WGS analyses tool to address this problem. The demo video and supplementary materials of GT-WGS can be accessed at https://github.com/Genetalks/wgs_analysis_demo .

Indexed as

Genome, HumanSoftwareCloud ComputingCluster AnalysisGenomicsHumansSequence Analysis, DNAWhole Genome SequencingAWSParallel and distributed computingWhole-genome sequencing

Identifiers

PMID29363427
PMCPMC5780748

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.