ArticleBMC genomics2018
Success: evolutionary and structural properties of amino acids prove effective for succinylation site prediction.
Article in BMC genomics, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 30 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
30 citing papers in PubMed.
- Identifying protein succinylation sites using generative transformer and a two-dimensional representation with a deep capsule network.iScience · 2025Article
- ResLysEmbed: a ResNet-based framework for succinylated lysine residue prediction using sequence and language model embeddings.Bioinformatics advances · 2025Article
- Impact of Lysine Succinylation on the Biology of Fungi.Current issues in molecular biology · 2024Review
- Protein post-translational modification by lysine succinylation: Biochemistry, biological implications, and therapeutic opportunities.Genes & diseases · 2023Review
- pSuc-EDBAM: Predicting lysine succinylation sites in proteins based on ensemble dense blocks and an attention module.BMC bioinformatics · 2022Article
- iSuc-ChiDT: a computational method for identifying succinylation sites using statistical difference table encoding and the chi-square decision table classifier.BioData mining · 2022Article
- Deep_KsuccSite: A novel deep learning method for the identification of lysine succinylation sites.Frontiers in genetics · 2022Article
- MDCAN-Lys: A Model for Predicting Succinylation Sites Based on Multilane Dense Convolutional Attention Network.Biomolecules · 2021Article
- Identifying Membrane Protein Types Based on Lifelong Learning With Dynamically Scalable Networks.Frontiers in genetics · 2021Article
- FSL-Kla: A few-shot learning-based multi-feature hybrid system for lactylation site prediction.Computational and structural biotechnology journal · 2021Article
- LSTMCNNsucc: A Bidirectional LSTM and CNN-Based Deep Learning Method for Predicting Lysine Succinylation Sites.BioMed research international · 2021Article
- Article
- PupStruct: Prediction of Pupylated Lysine Residues Using Structural Properties of Amino Acids.Genes · 2020Article
- Accurately Predicting Glutarylation Sites Using Sequential Bi-Peptide-Based Evolutionary Features.Genes · 2020Article
- Recent Development of Machine Learning Methods in Microbial Phosphorylation Sites.Current genomics · 2020Review
- HybridSucc: A Hybrid-learning Architecture for General and Species-specific Succinylation Site Prediction.Genomics, proteomics & bioinformatics · 2020Article
- Bigram-PGK: phosphoglycerylation prediction using the technique of bigram probabilities of position specific scoring matrix.BMC molecular and cell biology · 2019Article
- Characterization and Identification of Lysine Succinylation Sites based on Deep Learning Method.Scientific reports · 2019Article
- Computational identification of microbial phosphorylation sites by the enhanced characteristics of sequence information.Scientific reports · 2019Article
- EvolStruct-Phogly: incorporating structural properties and evolutionary information from profile bigrams for the phosphoglycerylation prediction.BMC genomics · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundPost-translational modification is considered an important biological mechanism with critical impact on the diversification of the proteome. Although a long list of such modifications has been studied, succinylation of lysine residues has recently attracted the interest of the scientific community. The experimental detection of succinylation sites is an expensive process, which consumes a lot of time and resources. Therefore, computational predictors of this covalent modification have emerged as a last resort to tackling lysine succinylation.
resultsIn this paper, we propose a novel computational predictor called 'Success', which efficiently uses the structural and evolutionary information of amino acids for predicting succinylation sites. To do this, each lysine was described as a vector that combined the above information of surrounding amino acids. We then designed a support vector machine with a radial basis function kernel for discriminating between succinylated and non-succinylated residues. We finally compared the Success predictor with three state-of-the-art predictors in the literature. As a result, our proposed predictor showed a significant improvement over the compared predictors in statistical metrics, such as sensitivity (0.866), accuracy (0.838) and Matthews correlation coefficient (0.677) on a benchmark dataset.
conclusionsThe proposed predictor effectively uses the structural and evolutionary information of the amino acids surrounding a lysine. The bigram feature extraction approach, while retaining the same number of features, facilitates a better description of lysines. A support vector machine with a radial basis function kernel was used to discriminate between modified and unmodified lysines. The aforementioned aspects make the Success predictor outperform three state-of-the-art predictors in succinylation detection.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.