Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29362969›Full record

ArticleJournal of religion and health2020

"What Goes Around Comes Around": Attitudes and Practices Regarding Ageing and Care for the Elderly Among Moroccan Muslim Women Living in Antwerp (Belgium).

Chaïma Ahaddour, Stef Van den Branden, Bert Broeckaert

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of religion and health, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Chaïma AhaddourResearch Unit of Theological and Comparative Ethics, Faculty of Theology and Religious Studies, KU Leuven, Sint-Michielsstraat 6, Box 3101, 3000, Louvain, Belgium. Chaima.ahaddour@kuleuven.be.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5587-0351
Stef Van den BrandenResearch Unit of Theological and Comparative Ethics, Faculty of Theology and Religious Studies, KU Leuven, Sint-Michielsstraat 6, Box 3101, 3000, Louvain, Belgium.
Bert BroeckaertResearch Unit of Theological and Comparative Ethics, Faculty of Theology and Religious Studies, KU Leuven, Sint-Michielsstraat 6, Box 3101, 3000, Louvain, Belgium.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The aim of this article is threefold. First, we seek to elicit the attitudes and practices of middle-aged and elderly Moroccan Muslim women towards ageing and care for the elderly. Second, we aim to identify possible differences between middle-aged and elderly women's attitudes and practices. Third, we seek to explore which role religion plays in their attitudes and practices. Qualitative empirical research was conducted with a sample of middle-aged and elderly Moroccan Muslim women living in Antwerp (Belgium) (n = 30) and with experts in the field (n = 15). Our study unveils that ageing and care for the elderly are clearly understood from a religious framework. More specifically, theological and eschatological considerations take up a central position. Access to and utilization of professional elderly care is hampered by several barriers (e.g. religious, cultural and financial). We found a more open attitude towards professional elderly care among middle-aged women than among elderly women.

Indexed as

AttitudeIslamAdultAgedAgingAttitude to HealthBelgiumCultural CharacteristicsFemaleHealth BehaviorHumansInterviews as TopicMiddle AgedMoroccoQualitative ResearchReligion and MedicineCare for the elderlyGrounded theoryIslamMoroccan Muslim womenOld ageQualitative empirical researchWorld view

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.