Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29362966›Full record

ArticleJournal of medical ultrasonics (2001)2018

Fusion imaging with contrast-enhanced ultrasonography for evaluating the early therapeutic efficacy of radiofrequency ablation for small hypervascular hepatocellular carcinomas with iso-echoic or unclear margins on conventional ultrasonography.

Shuhei Nishigori, Kazushi Numata, Kuniyasu Irie, Hiroyuki Fukuda, Makoto Chuma, Shin Maeda

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of medical ultrasonics (2001), 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
1.8field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 22 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Application of new ultrasound techniques for focal liver lesions.Journal of medical ultrasonics (2001) · 2020
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Shuhei NishigoriGastroenterological Center, Yokohama City University Medical Center, 4-57 Urafune-cho, Minami-ku, Yokohama, Kanagawa, 232-0024, Japan.
Kazushi NumataGastroenterological Center, Yokohama City University Medical Center, 4-57 Urafune-cho, Minami-ku, Yokohama, Kanagawa, 232-0024, Japan. kz-numa@urahp.yokohama-cu.ac.jp.
Kuniyasu IrieGastroenterological Center, Yokohama City University Medical Center, 4-57 Urafune-cho, Minami-ku, Yokohama, Kanagawa, 232-0024, Japan.
Hiroyuki FukudaGastroenterological Center, Yokohama City University Medical Center, 4-57 Urafune-cho, Minami-ku, Yokohama, Kanagawa, 232-0024, Japan.
Makoto ChumaGastroenterological Center, Yokohama City University Medical Center, 4-57 Urafune-cho, Minami-ku, Yokohama, Kanagawa, 232-0024, Japan.
Shin MaedaDivision of Gastroenterology, Yokohama City University Graduate School of Medicine, 3-9 Fukuura, Kanazawa-ku, Yokohama, Kanagawa, 236-0004, Japan.
Yokohama City University · JPYokohama City University Medical Center · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeWe evaluated the efficacy of fusion imaging combining contrast-enhanced ultrasonography (CEUS) images and arterial phase contrast-enhanced CT (CECT) or hepatobiliary phase magnetic resonance imaging with gadolinium ethoxybenzyl diethylenetriamine pentaacetic acid (EOB-MRI) images for the early evaluation of the effectiveness of radiofrequency ablation (RFA) for small hypervascular hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) with iso-echoic or unclear margins on conventional US.

methodsForty HCCs (22 iso-echoic and 18 unclear margin lesions) with mean diameters of 13.7 mm were treated using RFA under the guidance of fusion imaging with CEUS. The adequacy of RFA was evaluated using fusion imaging with CEUS 1 day after RFA. CECT or EOB-MRI was performed 1 month after RFA. We reviewed the images obtained using both modalities.

resultsWhen the 1-month CECT or EOB-MRI scans were used as the reference standard, the sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of the 1-day fusion imaging for the diagnosis of the adequate ablation of these HCCs were 97, 100, and 98%, respectively; the kappa value for the agreement between the findings using the two modalities was 0.655.

conclusionFusion imaging with CEUS appears to be a useful method for the early evaluation of the efficacy of RFA for the treatment of HCCs with iso-echoic or unclear margins on conventional US.

Indexed as

Catheter AblationUltrasonographyAgedAged, 80 and overCarcinoma, HepatocellularContrast MediaDisease ProgressionFemaleFollow-Up StudiesGadolinium DTPAHumansLiverLiver NeoplasmsMagnetic Resonance ImagingMaleMiddle AgedContrast MediaGadolinium DTPAgadolinium ethoxybenzyl DTPAContrast-enhanced ultrasonographyFusion imagingHepatocellular carcinomaRadiofrequency ablation

Identifiers

PMID29362966
OpenAlexW2793360521

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.