Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29362922›Full record

SynthesisClinical and experimental medicine2018

Prognostic and clinicopathological significance of PD-L1 in patients with renal cell carcinoma: a meta-analysis based on 1863 individuals.

Zhun Wang, Shuanghe Peng, Hui Xie, Linpei Guo, Qiliang Cai, Zhiqun Shang, Ning Jiang, Yuanjie Niu

Abstract readMeta-Analysis
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Clinical and experimental medicine, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 27 papers, 5 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
27citing papers in PubMed, 5 pooled it
3.3field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

27 citing papers in PubMed, 5 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 48 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Zhun WangDepartments of Urology, Tianjin Institute of Urology, The Second Hospital of Tianjin Medical University, No. 23, Pingjiang Road, Hexi District, Tianjin, 300211, China.
Shuanghe PengDepartments of Urology, Tianjin Institute of Urology, The Second Hospital of Tianjin Medical University, No. 23, Pingjiang Road, Hexi District, Tianjin, 300211, China.
Hui XieDepartments of Urology, Tianjin Institute of Urology, The Second Hospital of Tianjin Medical University, No. 23, Pingjiang Road, Hexi District, Tianjin, 300211, China.
Linpei GuoDepartments of Urology, Tianjin Institute of Urology, The Second Hospital of Tianjin Medical University, No. 23, Pingjiang Road, Hexi District, Tianjin, 300211, China.
Qiliang CaiDepartments of Urology, Tianjin Institute of Urology, The Second Hospital of Tianjin Medical University, No. 23, Pingjiang Road, Hexi District, Tianjin, 300211, China.
Zhiqun ShangDepartments of Urology, Tianjin Institute of Urology, The Second Hospital of Tianjin Medical University, No. 23, Pingjiang Road, Hexi District, Tianjin, 300211, China.
Ning JiangDepartments of Urology, Tianjin Institute of Urology, The Second Hospital of Tianjin Medical University, No. 23, Pingjiang Road, Hexi District, Tianjin, 300211, China.
Yuanjie NiuDepartments of Urology, Tianjin Institute of Urology, The Second Hospital of Tianjin Medical University, No. 23, Pingjiang Road, Hexi District, Tianjin, 300211, China. yuanjieniu2014@163.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3797-8275
Second Hospital of Tianjin Medical University · CN

Funding

National Natural Science Foundation of China 81472682National Natural Science Foundation of China 81772756Natural Science Foundation of Tianjin City 15JCYBJC27200Natural Science Foundation of Tianjin City 15JCZDJC35400Natural Science Foundation of Tianjin City 17JCZDJC35300
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The prognostic significance of PD-L1 in renal cell carcinoma (RCC) had been investigated in previous studies; however, the results remain controversial. The primary aim of this meta-analysis was to investigate the prognostic and clinicopathological significance of the PD-L1 expression in patients with RCC. Relevant literature was identified form PubMed, Embase, Web of Science and Cochrane library, which compared the prognostic significance between PD-L1 expression and RCC. Hazard ratios (HRs) for survival outcomes and odds ratios (ORs) for clinical parameters associated with PD-L1 were extracted from eligible studies. Heterogeneity was assessed using the I

Indexed as

Up-RegulationB7-H1 AntigenCarcinoma, Renal CellFemaleGene Expression Regulation, NeoplasticHumansKidney NeoplasmsMaleNeoplasm StagingPrognosisSurvival AnalysisB7-H1 AntigenCD274 protein, humanMeta-analysisPD-L1PrognosisRenal cell carcinoma

Identifiers

PMID29362922
OpenAlexW2792415548

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.