Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29362863›Full record

ReviewArchives of toxicology2018

Innovative organotypic in vitro models for safety assessment: aligning with regulatory requirements and understanding models of the heart, skin, and liver as paradigms.

Chris S Pridgeon, Constanze Schlott, Min Wei Wong, Minne B Heringa, Tobias Heckel, Joe Leedale, Laurence Launay, Vitalina Gryshkova, Stefan Przyborski, Rachel N Bearon and 11 more

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Archives of toxicology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Development of a micronucleus test using the EpiAirway™ organotypic human airway model.Genes and environment : the official journal of the Japanese Environmental Mutagen Society · 2023
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Principles and Procedures for Assessment of Acute Toxicity IncorporatingComputational toxicology (Amsterdam, Netherlands) · 2022
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Computational toxicology (Amsterdam, Netherlands) · 2021
    Article
  10. Strategies to apply 3Rs in preclinical testing.Pharmacology research & perspectives · 2021
    Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

21 authors.

Chris S PridgeonDepartment of Molecular and Clinical Pharmacology, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, L69 3GE, UK.
Constanze SchlottDepartment of Molecular and Clinical Pharmacology, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, L69 3GE, UK.
Min Wei WongDepartment of Molecular and Clinical Pharmacology, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, L69 3GE, UK.
Minne B HeringaNational Institute for Public Health and the Environment (RIVM), Bilthoven, The Netherlands.
Tobias HeckelDr. Johannes Heidenhain GmbH, Dr.-Johannes-Heidenhain-Straße 5, 83301, Traunreut, Germany.
Joe LeedaleDepartment of Mathematical Sciences, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, L69 7ZL, UK.
Laurence LaunayTechnologie Servier, Orléans, France.
Vitalina GryshkovaInvestigative Toxicology, Department of Non-Clinical Development, UCB Biopharma SPRL, 1420, Braine L'Alleud, Belgium.
Stefan PrzyborskiDepartment of Biosciences, Durham University, Durham, DH1 3LE, UK.
Rachel N BearonDepartment of Mathematical Sciences, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, L69 7ZL, UK.
Emma L WilkinsonDepartment of Molecular and Clinical Pharmacology, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, L69 3GE, UK.
Tahera AnsariNorthwick Park Institute for Medical Research, Northwick Park and St Mark's Hospital, Middlesex, HA1 3UJ, UK.
John GreenmanSchool of Life Sciences, University of Hull, Hull, HU6 7RX, UK.
Delilah F G HendriksSection of Pharmacogenetics, Department of Physiology and Pharmacology, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.
Sue GibbsDepartment of Dermatology, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
James SidawayPhenotox Ltd, Cheshire, SK10 5QT, UK.
Rowena L Sison-YoungDepartment of Molecular and Clinical Pharmacology, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, L69 3GE, UK.
Paul WalkerCyprotex Discovery Ltd, Cheshire, SK10 4TG, UK.
Mike J CrossDepartment of Molecular and Clinical Pharmacology, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, L69 3GE, UK.
B Kevin ParkDepartment of Molecular and Clinical Pharmacology, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, L69 3GE, UK.
Chris E P GoldringDepartment of Molecular and Clinical Pharmacology, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, L69 3GE, UK. chrissy@liv.ac.uk.

Funding

Innovative Medicines Initiative SafeSciMET 115012Medical Research Council G0700654Medical Research Council MR/L006758/1Medical Research Council Centre for Drug Safety Science Grant G0700654National Centre for the Replacement, Refinement and Reduction of Animals in Research G1100600/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The development of improved, innovative models for the detection of toxicity of drugs, chemicals, or chemicals in cosmetics is crucial to efficiently bring new products safely to market in a cost-effective and timely manner. In addition, improvement in models to detect toxicity may reduce the incidence of unexpected post-marketing toxicity and reduce or eliminate the need for animal testing. The safety of novel products of the pharmaceutical, chemical, or cosmetics industry must be assured; therefore, toxicological properties need to be assessed. Accepted methods for gathering the information required by law for approval of substances are often animal methods. To reduce, refine, and replace animal testing, innovative organotypic in vitro models have emerged. Such models appear at different levels of complexity ranging from simpler, self-organized three-dimensional (3D) cell cultures up to more advanced scaffold-based co-cultures consisting of multiple cell types. This review provides an overview of recent developments in the field of toxicity testing with in vitro models for three major organ types: heart, skin, and liver. This review also examines regulatory aspects of such models in Europe and the UK, and summarizes best practices to facilitate the acceptance and appropriate use of advanced in vitro models.

Indexed as

Cell Culture TechniquesAnimalsAnimal Testing AlternativesConsumer Product SafetyHeartHumansLiverSkinToxicity Tests3D in vitro modelsHeartLiverSkin

Identifiers

PMID29362863
PMCPMC5818581

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.