Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29362858›Full record

SynthesisEuropean journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging2018

Repeatability of quantitative

G M Kramer, Y Liu, A J de Langen, E P Jansma, I Trigonis, M-C Asselin, A Jackson, L Kenny, E O Aboagye, O S Hoekstra and 2 more

Open access · hybridAbstract readMeta-Analysis
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Synthesis in European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 20% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Role of 3'-Deoxy-3'-[JTO clinical and research reports · 2022
    Article
  4. Sensitivity ofEJNMMI research · 2019
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Reply: Should we assess repeatability of PET quantitative uptake measurements of eachEuropean journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging · 2018
    Article
  7. Should we assess repeatability of PET quantitative uptake measurements of eachEuropean journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging · 2018
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 6 institutions in 3 countries.

G M KramerDepartment of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, VU University Medical Center, PO Box 7057, 1007 MB, Amsterdam, Netherlands. ge.kramer@vumc.nl.
Y LiuEuropean Organisation for Research and Treatment for Cancer (EORTC), Headquarters, Brussels, Belgium.
A J de LangenDepartment of Pulmonology, VU University Medical Center, PO Box 7057, 1007 MB, Amsterdam, Netherlands.
E P JansmaMedical Library, VU University Medical Center, PO Box 7057, 1007 MB, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
I TrigonisDivision of Informatics, Imaging and Data Sciences Institute of Population Health, Wolfson Molecular Imaging Centre, Manchester Academic Health Sciences Centre, The University of Manchester, Manchester, UK.
M-C AsselinDivision of Informatics, Imaging and Data Sciences Institute of Population Health, Wolfson Molecular Imaging Centre, Manchester Academic Health Sciences Centre, The University of Manchester, Manchester, UK.
A JacksonDivision of Informatics, Imaging and Data Sciences Institute of Population Health, Wolfson Molecular Imaging Centre, Manchester Academic Health Sciences Centre, The University of Manchester, Manchester, UK.
L KennyDepartment of Surgery and Cancer, Imperial College London, Hammersmith Campus, London, UK.
E O AboagyeDepartment of Surgery and Cancer, Imperial College London, Hammersmith Campus, London, UK.
O S HoekstraDepartment of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, VU University Medical Center, PO Box 7057, 1007 MB, Amsterdam, Netherlands.
R BoellaardDepartment of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, VU University Medical Center, PO Box 7057, 1007 MB, Amsterdam, Netherlands.
QuIC-ConCePT consortium
Amsterdam UMC Location VUmc · NLUniversity of Manchester · GBEuropean Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer · BEHammersmith Hospital · GBImperial College London · GBManchester Academic Health Science Centre · GB

Funding

Cancer Research UK 16465Cancer Research UK 18097Department of Health NIHR/CS/009/009
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introduction3'-deoxy-3'-[

methodsA systematic search in PubMed, EMBASE.com and the Cochrane Library from inception-October 2016 yielded five

resultsImages from four cohorts containing 30 patients with 52 lesions were obtained and analyzed (ten in breast cancer, nine in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma, and 33 in non-small cell lung cancer patients). A good correlation was found between test-retest data for all

conclusionsIn multi-center studies, differences ≥ 25% in

Indexed as

Positron Emission Tomography Computed TomographyDideoxynucleosidesHumansNeoplasmsPositron-Emission TomographyReproducibility of ResultsalovudineDideoxynucleosidesFltOncologyPETRepeatability

Identifiers

PMID29362858
PMCPMC5915500
OpenAlexW2792004179

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.