Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29362835›Full record

ArticleStrahlentherapie und Onkologie : Organ der Deutschen Rontgengesellschaft ... [et al]2018

Repeat reirradiation of the spinal cord: multi-national expert treatment recommendations.

Carsten Nieder, Laurie E Gaspar, Dirk De Ruysscher, Matthias Guckenberger, Minesh P Mehta, Chad G Rusthoven, Arjun Sahgal, Eleni Gkika

Abstract readCase Reports
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Strahlentherapie und Onkologie : Organ der Deutschen Rontgengesellschaft ... [et al], 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
2.8field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 23 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. New clinical data on human spinal cord re-irradiation tolerance.Strahlentherapie und Onkologie : Organ der Deutschen Rontgengesellschaft ... [et al] · 2021
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Automatic image segmentation based on synthetic tissue model for delineating organs at risk in spinal metastasis treatment planning.Strahlentherapie und Onkologie : Organ der Deutschen Rontgengesellschaft ... [et al] · 2019
    Article
  8. Tomotherapy in malignant mesothelioma: a planning study to establish dose constraints.Strahlentherapie und Onkologie : Organ der Deutschen Rontgengesellschaft ... [et al] · 2019
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 7 institutions in 6 countries.

Carsten NiederDepartment of Oncology and Palliative Medicine, Nordland Hospital, 8092, Bodø, Norway. carsten.nieder@nlsh.no.ORCID 0000-0003-1592-2908
Laurie E GasparDepartment of Radiation Oncology, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, CO, USA.
Dirk De RuysscherDepartment of Radiation Oncology, MAASTRO Clinic, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
Matthias GuckenbergerDepartment of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.
Minesh P MehtaDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Miami Cancer Institute, Miami, FL, USA.
Chad G RusthovenDepartment of Radiation Oncology, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, CO, USA.
Arjun SahgalDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre and University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada.
Eleni GkikaDepartment of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany.
University of Colorado Denver · USMaastro Clinic · NLMiami Heart Research Institute · USNordland Hospital Trust · NOSunnybrook Health Science Centre · CAUniversity Hospital of Zurich · CHUniversity Medical Center Freiburg · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundImproved survival of patients with spinal bone metastases has resulted in an increased number of referrals for retreatment and repeat reirradiation.

methodsA consortium of expert radiation oncologists (RO) has been established with the aim of providing treatment recommendations for challenging clinical scenarios for which there are no established guidelines. In this case, a patient developed local progression of a T5 vertebral lesion after two prior courses of palliative radiotherapy (time interval >12 months, assumed cumulative biologically equivalent dose in 2‑Gy fractions [EQD2] for spinal cord [alpha/beta 2 Gy] 75 Gy). Expert recommendations were tabulated with the aim of providing guidance.

resultsFive of seven RO would offer a third course of radiotherapy, preferably with advanced techniques such as stereotactic radiotherapy. However, the dose-fractionation concepts were heterogeneous (3-20 fractions) and sometimes adjusted to different options for systemic treatment. All five RO would compromise target volume coverage to reduce the dose to the spinal cord. Definition of the spinal cord planning-organ-at-risk volume was heterogeneous. All five RO limited the EQD2 for spinal cord. Two were willing to accept more than 12.5 Gy and the highest EQD2 was 19 Gy.

conclusionsThe increasing body of literature about bone metastases and spinal cord reirradiation has encouraged some expert RO to offer palliative reirradiation with cumulative cord doses above 75 Gy EQD2; however, no consensus was achieved. Strategies for harmonization of clinical practice and development of evidence-based dose constraints are discussed.

Indexed as

Interdisciplinary CommunicationIntersectoral CollaborationProfessional CompetenceRe-IrradiationCarcinoma, Renal CellDisease ProgressionGuideline AdherenceHumansKidney NeoplasmsMaleMiddle AgedPalliative CareRadiotherapy DosageSpinal CordSpinal NeoplasmsSurvival RateBone metastasesIn-field relapseLocal controlPalliative radiotherapyRadiation myelopathy

Identifiers

PMID29362835
OpenAlexW2784861486

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.