Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29362658›Full record

ArticleWideochirurgia i inne techniki maloinwazyjne = Videosurgery and other miniinvasive techniques2017

Spinal anesthesia is safe in laparoscopic total extraperitoneal inguinal hernia repair. A retrospective clinical trial.

Dogan Yildirim, Adnan Hut, Sinan Uzman, Ahmet Kocakusak, Suleyman Demiryas, Mikail Cakir, Cihad Tatar

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Wideochirurgia i inne techniki maloinwazyjne = Videosurgery and other miniinvasive techniques, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05837013 (Comparison of Open and Laparoscopic Total Extraperitoneal Inguinal Hernia Repair), which is not on this map. Cited by 9 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.7field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05837013 nacompletednot on this mapstarted 2023, after this paper: background citation

Comparison of Open and Laparoscopic Total Extraperitoneal Inguinal Hernia Repair (TEP) Performed Under Blocked Spinal Anesthesia and General Anesthesia: Prospective Randomized Study

TypeinterventionalSponsorKonya City HospitalRan2023 to 2024Enrolled34ConditionsPain, Postoperative, Postoperative Complications, Inguinal HerniaArmsSpinal anesthesia (with nerve block), General anesthesia (GA)
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 15 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Totally extraperitoneal inguinal hernia repair with or without fixation leads to similar results. Outcome of randomized prospective trial.Wideochirurgia i inne techniki maloinwazyjne = Videosurgery and other miniinvasive techniques · 2020
    Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Dogan YildirimDepartment of General Surgery, Haseki Training and Research Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey.
Adnan HutDepartment of General Surgery, Haseki Training and Research Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey.
Sinan UzmanDepartment of Anesthesiology, Haseki Training and Research Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey.
Ahmet KocakusakDepartment of General Surgery, Haseki Training and Research Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey.
Suleyman DemiryasDepartment of General Surgery, Cerrahpasa Medicine Faculty, Istanbul, Turkey.
Mikail CakirDepartment of General Surgery, Haseki Training and Research Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey.
Cihad TatarDepartment of General Surgery, Istanbul Training and Research Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey.
Haseki Eğitim ve Araştırma Hastanesi · TRIstanbul University-Cerrahpaşa · TR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionLaparoscopic total extraperitoneal (TEP) inguinal hernia repair is an effective and safe method for the treatment of inguinal hernia. There are very few studies on regional anesthesia methods in TEP surgery.

aimTo compare TEP inguinal hernia repair performed when the patient was treated under spinal anesthesia (SA) with that performed under general anesthesia (GA). MATERIAL AND

methodsAll total of 80 patients were studied between December 2015 and March 2017. Hyperbaric bupivacaine and fentanyl were used for SA, to achieve a sensorial level of T3. Propofol, sevoflurane, rocuronium, fentanyl, and tracheal intubation were used for GA. Intraoperative events related to SA, surgical times, intra- and postoperative complications, and pain scores were recorded.

resultsThe mean operative time in the SA TEP group was 70.2 ±6.7 min, which was significantly longer than the mean operative time in the GA TEP group of 67.2 ±6.2 min (p < 0.038). The mean pain scores in the SA TEP group were 0.23 ±0.42 at the first hour, 1.83 ±0.64 at 6 h and 1.28 ±0.45 at 24 h. These scores were significantly lower than the corresponding scores of 5.18 ±0.84 (p < 0.001), 2.50 ±0.55 (p < 0.001) and 1.58 ±0.55 in the GA TEP group. Generally, patients were more satisfied with SA than GA (p < 0.004).

conclusionsSpinal anesthesia TEP is significantly less painful in the early postoperative period, leading to earlier ambulation than GA TEP. Additionally, SA TEP results in significantly less need for analgesics and better patient satisfaction results. SA TEP seems to be a better alternative than the existing GA TEP.

Indexed as

general anesthesialaparoscopic repairspinal anesthesia

Identifiers

PMID29362658
PMCPMC5776491
OpenAlexW2775871078

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.