Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29362251›Full record

Observational studyBMJ open2018

Evaluation and management of patients with acute chest pain in China (EMPACT): protocol for a prospective, multicentre registry study.

Wen Zheng, Jiali Wang, Feng Xu, Jiaqi Zheng, He Zhang, Jingjing Ma, Guangmei Wang, Hao Wang, Derek P Chew, Yuguo Chen

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract readMulticenter StudyObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in BMJ open, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT02536677 (The Evaluation and Management of Patients With Acute ChesT Pain in China), which is not on this map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 25% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT02536677 completednot on this map

The Evaluation and Management of Patients With Acute ChesT Pain in China

Typeobservational_patient_registrySponsorYuguo ChenRan2016 to 2017Enrolled8,374ConditionsAcute Chest Pain, Acute Coronary Syndrome
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 13 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Discovery of vasodilatory effects of NaActa pharmacologica Sinica · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Observational
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Wen ZhengDepartment of Emergency and Chest Pain Center, Qilu Hospital, Shandong University, Jinan, China.
Jiali WangDepartment of Emergency and Chest Pain Center, Qilu Hospital, Shandong University, Jinan, China.
Feng XuDepartment of Emergency and Chest Pain Center, Qilu Hospital, Shandong University, Jinan, China.
Jiaqi ZhengDepartment of Emergency and Chest Pain Center, Qilu Hospital, Shandong University, Jinan, China.
He ZhangDepartment of Emergency and Chest Pain Center, Qilu Hospital, Shandong University, Jinan, China.
Jingjing MaDepartment of Emergency and Chest Pain Center, Qilu Hospital, Shandong University, Jinan, China.
Guangmei WangDepartment of Emergency and Chest Pain Center, Qilu Hospital, Shandong University, Jinan, China.
Hao WangDepartment of Emergency and Chest Pain Center, Qilu Hospital, Shandong University, Jinan, China.
Derek P ChewDepartment of Cardiovascular Medicine, Flinders University, Adelaide, Australia.
Yuguo ChenDepartment of Emergency and Chest Pain Center, Qilu Hospital, Shandong University, Jinan, China.
Shandong University · CNQilu Hospital of Shandong University · CNFlinders University · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionAcute chest pain represents a major healthcare burden in emergency departments (ED) throughout the world. Among these patients, rapidly determining whether an acute coronary syndrome (ACS) is evolving remains difficult. In China, there are limited data correlating the baseline characteristics, evaluation and management of ED patients with acute chest pain and ACS-related symptoms with clinical outcomes. Nor has there been an evaluation of outcomes at different levels of hospitals. The Evaluation and Management of Patients with Acute ChesT pain in China (EMPACT) study will address this evidence gap through a regional representative prospective registry. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: Twenty-two public hospitals with ED in Shandong province have been selected based on a stratified random sampling approach. A total of 10 000 patients with acute chest pain or suspected ACS presenting to the ED will be consecutively enrolled from January 2016 to September 2017. Episodes of care will be evaluated for key performance measures such as the time to first ECG, receipt of troponin testing, receipt of reperfusion therapy for ST segment elevation ACS and provision of angiography for troponin-positive patients. All patients will be assessed for the composite endpoint of adjudicated major adverse cardiac events in 30 days after presentation, including death from all causes, non-fatal myocardial infarction, urgent revascularisation, stroke, cardiac arrest and cardiogenic shock. The secondary outcomes include revisit to ED and rehospitalisation within 30 days. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: Ethics approval was obtained at all participating centres. The registry is the first attempt to comprehensively evaluate the current emergency care of acute chest pain from a regional representative sample in China. Findings will allow new opportunities to facilitate the clinical quality improvements and ultimately reduce the mortality in patients with acute chest pain and suspected ACS. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT02536677; Pre-results.

Indexed as

Acute Coronary SyndromeAcute DiseaseBiomarkersChest PainChinaElectrocardiographyEmergency Medical ServicesEvidence-Based MedicineFemaleHumansMaleMedical History TakingPatient Care TeamProspective StudiesRegistriesResearch DesignBiomarkersTroponinAcute Chest PainEmergency DepartmentEvaluationManagementOutcomes

Identifiers

PMID29362251
PMCPMC5786136
OpenAlexW2791836078

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.