Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29362244›Full record

Trial reportBMJ open2018

Impact of early palliative care on overall survival of patients with metastatic upper gastrointestinal cancers treated with first-line chemotherapy: a randomised phase III trial.

Emilie Hutt, Arlette Da Silva, Emilie Bogart, Sara Le Lay-Diomande, Diane Pannier, Stéphanie Delaine-Clisant, Marie-Cécile Le Deley, Antoine Adenis

Erratum issued Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract readClinical Trial, Phase IIIMulticenter StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in BMJ open, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. It is linked to trial NCT02853474 (Impact of Early Palliative Care on Overall Survival of Patients With Metastatic Upper Gastrointestinal Cancers, Treated With First-line Chemotherapy), which is not on this map. Cited by 8 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.8field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT02853474 phase3completednot on this map

Impact of Early Palliative Care on Overall Survival of Patients With Metastatic Upper Gastrointestinal Cancers, Treated With First-line Chemotherapy: a Randomized Phase III Trial

TypeinterventionalSponsorCentre Oscar LambretRan2016 to 2022Enrolled480ConditionsGastric Cancer, Pancreas Cancer, Bile Duct Cancer, Gastroesophageal CancerArmsEarly Palliative Care visit, EORTC-QLQ-C30 questionnaire, HADS score
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 15 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Emilie HuttDepartment of Gastrointestinal Oncology, Centre Oscar Lambret, Lille, France.
Arlette Da SilvaPalliative Care Unit, Centre Oscar Lambret, Lille, France.
Emilie BogartMethodology and Biostatistic Unit, Centre Oscar Lambret, Lille, France.
Sara Le Lay-DiomandeClinical Research Unit, Centre Oscar Lambret, Lille, France.
Diane PannierDepartment of Gastrointestinal Oncology, Centre Oscar Lambret, Lille, France.
Stéphanie Delaine-ClisantClinical Research Unit, Centre Oscar Lambret, Lille, France.
Marie-Cécile Le DeleyMethodology and Biostatistic Unit, Centre Oscar Lambret, Lille, France.
Antoine AdenisDepartment of Gastrointestinal Oncology, Centre Oscar Lambret, Lille, France.
Centre Oscar Lambret · FRInserm · FR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionPalliative care (PC) has usually been offered at the end-of-life stage, although the WHO recommends providing PC as early as possible in the course of the disease. A recent study has shown that early PC (EPC) provides a more meaningful effect on quality of life and, surprisingly, on overall survival (OS) than standard treatment for patients with metastatic lung cancer. Whether EPC benefits also apply to patients with metastatic upper gastrointestinal (GI) cancers is unknown. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: EPIC is a randomised phase III trial comparing EPC plus standard oncologic care versus standard oncologic care in patients with metastatic upper GI cancers. Its primary objective is to evaluate the efficacy of EPC in terms of OS. Its secondary objectives are to assess the effects of EPC on patient-reported outcomes (quality of life, depression and anxiety) and the effect of EPC on the number of patients receiving chemotherapy in their last 30 days of life. Assuming an exponential distribution of survival time, 381 deaths are required to ensure an 80% power for an absolute difference of 10% in 1 year OS rates (40% vs 50.3%, HR=0.75; log rank test two-sided alpha=5%), leading to a planned sample size of 480 patients enrolled over 3 years and a final analysis at 4 years. The main analysis will be performed on the intent-to-treat dataset. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: This study was approved by the 'Comité de Protection des Personnes Nord-Ouest I' (4 April 2016), complies with the Helsinki declaration and French laws and regulations and follows the International Conference on Harmonisation E6 (R1) Guideline for Good Clinical Practice. The trial results, even if they are inconclusive, will be presented at international oncology congresses and published in peer-reviewed journals. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBERS: EudraCT: 2015-A01943-46; Pre-results. NCT02853474.

Indexed as

Quality of LifeAntineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy ProtocolsFranceGastrointestinal NeoplasmsHumansMedical OncologyPalliative CareResearch DesignSurvival Analysisgastrointestinal cancerpalliative carerandomized trial

Identifiers

PMID29362244
PMCPMC5786132
OpenAlexW2788589133

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.