Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29362167›Full record

SynthesisAmerican journal of preventive medicine2018

The Cost of Interventions to Increase Influenza Vaccination: A Systematic Review.

Laura J Anderson, Paul Shekelle, Emmett Keeler, Lori Uscher-Pines, Roberta Shanman, Sally Morton, Gursel Aliyev, Teryl K Nuckols

Open access · greenAbstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in American journal of preventive medicine, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
2.3field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 21 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Predict Health Care Accessibility for Texas Medicaid Gap.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Laura J AndersonDepartment of Medicine, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, California; Department of Epidemiology, UCLA Jonathan and Karin Fielding School of Public Health, University of California-Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California. Electronic address: laura.anderson@cshs.org.
Paul ShekelleEvidence-based Synthesis Program, West Los Angeles VA Medical Center, Los Angeles, California; Rand Health, RAND Corporation, Santa Monica, California.
Emmett KeelerRand Health, RAND Corporation, Santa Monica, California.
Lori Uscher-PinesRand Health, RAND Corporation, Santa Monica, California.
Roberta ShanmanRand Health, RAND Corporation, Santa Monica, California.
Sally MortonDepartment of Statistics, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, Blacksburg, Virginia.
Gursel AliyevRand Health, RAND Corporation, Santa Monica, California.
Teryl K NuckolsDepartment of Medicine, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, California; Rand Health, RAND Corporation, Santa Monica, California.
RAND Corporation · USCedars-Sinai Medical Center · USUniversity of California, Los Angeles · USVirginia Tech · US

Funding

When Is Quality Improvement Cost Saving, Cost Effective, or Not a Good Value?R01HS022644 · AHRQ · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA LOS ANGELES · PI NUCKOLS, TERYL · 2013 to 2013
$997k
AHRQ HHS R01 HS022644
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

contextInfluenza vaccination rates remain below Healthy People 2020 goals. This project sought to systematically review economic evaluations of healthcare-based quality improvement interventions for improving influenza vaccination uptake among general populations and healthcare workers. EVIDENCE ACQUISITION: The databases MEDLINE, Econlit, Centre for Reviews & Dissemination, Greylit, and Worldcat were searched in July 2016 for papers published from January 2004 to July 2016. Eligible studies evaluated efforts by bodies within the healthcare system to encourage influenza vaccination by means of an organizational or structural change. For each study, program costs per enrollee and per additional enrollee vaccinated were derived (excluding vaccine costs, standardized to 2017 U.S. dollars). Complete economic evaluations were examined when available. EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS: Of 2,350 records, 18 articles were eligible and described 29 unique interventions. Most interventions improved vaccine uptake. Among 23 interventions in general populations, the median program cost was $3.27 (interquartile range, $0.82-$11.53) per enrollee and $50.78 (interquartile range, $27.85-$124.84) per additional enrollee vaccinated. Among ten complete economic evaluations in general populations, three studies reported net cost savings, four reported costs <$50,000 per quality-adjusted life year, and three reported costs <$60,000 per life saved. Among six interventions in healthcare workers, the median program cost was $8.09 (interquartile range, $5.03-$10.31) per worker enrolled and $125.24 (interquartile range, $96.06-$171.38) per additional worker vaccinated (there were no complete economic analyses).

conclusionsQuality improvement interventions for influenza vaccination involve per-enrollee costs that are similar to the cost of the vaccine itself ($11.78-$36.08/dose). Based on limited available evidence in general populations, quality improvement interventions may be cost saving to cost effective for the health system.

Indexed as

Cost-Benefit AnalysisCost of IllnessCost SavingsHumansImmunization ProgramsInfluenza, HumanInfluenza VaccinesMass VaccinationQuality-Adjusted Life YearsQuality ImprovementInfluenza Vaccines

Identifiers

PMID29362167
PMCPMC5788040
OpenAlexW2786342352

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.