Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29361985›Full record

ArticleBreast cancer research : BCR2018

Inherited factors contribute to an inverse association between preeclampsia and breast cancer.

Haomin Yang, Wei He, Mikael Eriksson, Jingmei Li, Natalie Holowko, Flaminia Chiesa, Per Hall, Kamila Czene

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Breast cancer research : BCR, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
0.8field-weighted citation impact, top 25% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 17 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Mother's age at delivery and daughters' risk of preeclampsia.Paediatric and perinatal epidemiology · 2019
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 1 institution in 2 countries.

Haomin YangDepartment of Medical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Karolinska Institutet, SE-17177, Stockholm, Sweden. haomin.yang@ki.se.ORCID 0000-0002-2252-2606
Wei HeDepartment of Medical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Karolinska Institutet, SE-17177, Stockholm, Sweden.
Mikael ErikssonDepartment of Medical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Karolinska Institutet, SE-17177, Stockholm, Sweden.
Jingmei LiDepartment of Medical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Karolinska Institutet, SE-17177, Stockholm, Sweden.
Natalie HolowkoDepartment of Medical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Karolinska Institutet, SE-17177, Stockholm, Sweden.
Flaminia ChiesaDepartment of Medical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Karolinska Institutet, SE-17177, Stockholm, Sweden.
Per HallDepartment of Medical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Karolinska Institutet, SE-17177, Stockholm, Sweden.
Kamila CzeneDepartment of Medical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Karolinska Institutet, SE-17177, Stockholm, Sweden.
Karolinska Institutet · SE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPreeclampsia is frequently linked to reduced breast cancer risk. However, little is known regarding the underlying genetic association and the association between preeclampsia and mammographic density.

methodsThis study estimates the incidence rate ratios (IRRs) of breast cancer in patients with preeclampsia, when compared to women without preeclampsia, using Poisson regression models in two cohorts of pregnant women: a Swedish nationwide cohort (n = 1,337,934, 1973-2011) and the Karolinska Mammography Project for Risk Prediction of Breast Cancer (KARMA, n = 55,044, 1958-2015). To identify the genetic association between preeclampsia and breast cancer, we used logistic regression models to calculate the odds ratios (ORs) of preeclampsia in sisters of breast cancer patients, and in women with different percentiles of breast cancer polygenic risk scores (PRS). Linear regression models were used to estimate the mammographic density by preeclampsia status in the KARMA cohort.

resultsA decreased risk of breast cancer was observed among patients with preeclampsia in both the nationwide (IRR = 0.90, 95% CI = 0.85; 0.96) and KARMA cohorts (IRR = 0.75, 95% CI = 0.61; 0.93). Women with high breast cancer PRS and sisters of breast cancer patients had a lower risk of preeclampsia (OR = 0.89, 95% CI = 0.83; 0.96). Mammographic density was lower in women with preeclampsia compared to women without preeclampsia (-2.04%, 95% CI = -2.65; -1.43). Additionally, among sisters in the KARMA cohort (N = 3500), density was lower in sisters of patients with preeclampsia compared to sisters of women without preeclampsia (-2.76%, 95% CI = -4.96; -0.56).

conclusionPreeclampsia is associated with reduced risk of breast cancer and mammographic density. Inherited factors contribute to this inverse association.

Indexed as

Breast DensityAdultBreastBreast NeoplasmsCohort StudiesFemaleHumansMammographyMiddle AgedPre-EclampsiaPregnancyRisk FactorsSwedenBreast cancerMammographic densityPreeclampsia

Identifiers

PMID29361985
PMCPMC5782395
OpenAlexW2795956653

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.