Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29361905›Full record

ArticleBMC genetics2018

Diversity of plant defense elicitor peptides within the Rosaceae.

Cristina Ruiz, Anna Nadal, Laura Foix, Laura Montesinos, Emilio Montesinos, Maria Pla

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC genetics, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
4.1field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 28 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. The PpPep2-Triggered PTI-like Response in Peach Trees Is Mediated by miRNAs.International journal of molecular sciences · 2024
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Horticulture research · 2019
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Cristina RuizInstitute for Food and Agricultural Technology (INTEA), University of Girona, Campus Montilivi (EPS-1), 17003, Girona, Spain.
Anna NadalInstitute for Food and Agricultural Technology (INTEA), University of Girona, Campus Montilivi (EPS-1), 17003, Girona, Spain.
Laura FoixInstitute for Food and Agricultural Technology (INTEA), University of Girona, Campus Montilivi (EPS-1), 17003, Girona, Spain.
Laura MontesinosInstitute for Food and Agricultural Technology (INTEA), University of Girona, Campus Montilivi (EPS-1), 17003, Girona, Spain.
Emilio MontesinosInstitute for Food and Agricultural Technology (INTEA), University of Girona, Campus Montilivi (EPS-1), 17003, Girona, Spain.
Maria PlaInstitute for Food and Agricultural Technology (INTEA), University of Girona, Campus Montilivi (EPS-1), 17003, Girona, Spain. maria.pla@udg.edu.ORCID 0000-0003-4382-5494
Universitat de Girona · ES

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPlant elicitor peptides (Peps) are endogenous molecules that induce and amplify the first line of inducible plant defense, known as pattern-triggered immunity, contributing to protect plants against attack by bacteria, fungi and herbivores. Pep topic application and transgenic expression have been found to enhance disease resistance in a small number of model plant-pathogen systems. The action of Peps relies on perception by specific receptors, so displaying a family-specific activity. Recently, the presence and activity of Peps within the Rosaceae has been demonstrated. Here we characterized the population of Pep sequences within the economically important plant family of Rosaceae, with special emphasis on the Amygdaleae and Pyreae tribes, which include the most relevant edible species such as apple, pear and peach, and numerous ornamental and wild species (e.g. photinia, firethorn and hawthorn).

resultsThe systematic experimental search for Pep and the corresponding precursor PROPEP sequences within 36 Amygdaleae and Pyreae species, and 100 cultivars had a highly homogeneous pattern, with two tribe-specific Pep types per plant, i.e. Pep1 and Pep2 (Amygdaleae) or Pep3 and Pep4 (Pyreae). Pep2 and Pep3 are highly conserved, reaching identity percentages similar to those of genes used in plant phylogenetic analyses, while Pep1 and Pep4 are somewhat more variable, with similar values to the corresponding PROPEPs. In contrast to Pep3 and Pep4, Pep1 and Pep2 sequences of different species paralleled their phylogenetic relationships, and putative ancestor sequences were identified. The large amount of sequences allowed refining of a C-terminal consensus sequence that would support the protective activity of Pep1-4 in a Prunus spp. and Xanthomonas arboricola pv. pruni system. Moreover, tribe-specific consensus sequences were deduced at the center and C-terminal regions of Peps, which might explain the higher protection efficiencies described upon topic treatments with Peps from the same tribe.

conclusionsThe present study substantially enhances the knowledge on Peps within the Amygdaleae and Pyreae species. It can be the basis to design and fine-tune new control tools against important plant pathogens affecting Prunus, Pyrus and Malus species.

Indexed as

Plant ImmunityPeptidesPlant ProteinsRosaceaePeptidesPlant ProteinsMalusOrnamentalPep diversityPlant defensePlant elicitor peptide (pep)PROPEPPrunusPyreaeRosaceae

Identifiers

PMID29361905
PMCPMC5782389
OpenAlexW2799975195

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.