Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29361822›Full record

ArticleCancer research and treatment2018

Ligand-Independent Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor Overexpression Correlates with Poor Prognosis in Colorectal Cancer.

Sumi Yun, Yoonjin Kwak, Soo Kyung Nam, An Na Seo, Heung-Kwon Oh, Duck-Woo Kim, Sung-Bum Kang, Hye Seung Lee

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cancer research and treatment, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 18% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 21 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Combined Therapeutic Effects ofInternational journal of nanomedicine · 2020
    Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Sumi YunDepartment of Diagnostic Pathology, Samkwang Medical Laboratories, Seoul, Korea.
Yoonjin KwakDepartment of Pathology, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Seongnam, Korea.
Soo Kyung NamDepartment of Pathology, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Seongnam, Korea.
An Na SeoDepartment of Pathology, Kyungpook National University Hospital, School of Medicine, Kyungpook National University, Daegu, Korea.
Heung-Kwon OhDepartment of Surgery, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Seongnam, Korea.
Duck-Woo KimDepartment of Surgery, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Seongnam, Korea.
Sung-Bum KangDepartment of Surgery, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Seongnam, Korea.
Hye Seung LeeDepartment of Pathology, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.
Seoul National University Bundang Hospital · KRSeoul National University · KRKyungpook National University Hospital · KR

Funding

Korea Health Industry Development InstituteMinistry of Health and Welfare HI14C1813
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeMolecular treatments targeting epidermal growth factor receptors (EGFRs) are important strategies for advanced colorectal cancer (CRC). However, clinicopathologic implications of EGFRs and EGFR ligand signaling have not been fully evaluated. We evaluated the expression of EGFR ligands and correlation with their receptors, clinicopathologic factors, and patients' survival with CRC. MATERIALS AND

methodsThe expression of EGFR ligands, including heparin binding epidermal growth factor-like growth factor (HBEGF), transforming growth factor (TGF), betacellulin, and epidermal growth factor (EGF), were evaluated in 331 consecutive CRC samples using mRNA in situ hybridization (ISH). We also evaluated the expression status of EGFR, human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2), HER3, and HER4 using immunohistochemistry and/or silver ISH.

resultsUnlike low incidences of TGF (38.1%), betacellulin (7.9%), and EGF (2.1%), HBEGF expression was noted in 62.2% of CRC samples. However, the expression of each EGFR ligand did not reveal significant correlations with survival. The combined analyses of EGFR ligands and EGFR expression indicated that the ligands‒/EGFR+ group showed a significant association with the worst disease-free survival (DFS; p=0.018) and overall survival (OS; p=0.005). It was also an independent, unfavorable prognostic factor for DFS (p=0.026) and OS (p=0.007). Additionally, HER4 nuclear expression, regardless of ligand expression, was an independent, favorable prognostic factor for DFS (p=0.034) and OS (p=0.049), by multivariate analysis.

conclusionLigand-independent EGFR overexpression was suggested to have a significant prognostic impact; thus, the expression status of EGFR ligands, in addition to EGFR, might be necessary for predicting patients' outcome in CRC.

Indexed as

AdultAgedAged, 80 and overBetacellulinColorectal NeoplasmsEGF Family of ProteinsEpidermal Growth FactorErb-b2 Receptor Tyrosine KinasesErbB ReceptorsFemaleGene Expression Regulation, NeoplasticHeparin-binding EGF-like Growth FactorHumansLigandsMaleMiddle AgedBetacellulinBTC protein, humanEGF Family of ProteinsEGFR protein, humanEpidermal Growth FactorERBB2 protein, humanErb-b2 Receptor Tyrosine KinasesERBB3 protein, humanERBB4 protein, humanErbB ReceptorsHBEGF protein, humanHeparin-binding EGF-like Growth FactorLigandsReceptor, ErbB-3Receptor, ErbB-4Transforming Growth FactorsColorectal neoplasmsEpidermal growth factor receptorLigandsmRNA in situ hybridization

Identifiers

PMID29361822
PMCPMC6192927
OpenAlexW2782670157

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.