Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29361482›Full record

ArticleJACC. Cardiovascular imaging2018

Poor Correlation, Reproducibility, and Agreement Between Volumetric Versus Linear Epicardial Adipose Tissue Measurement: A 3D Computed Tomography Versus 2D Echocardiography Comparison.

Nitesh Nerlekar, Yi-Wei Baey, Adam J Brown, Rahul G Muthalaly, Damini Dey, Balaji Tamarappoo, James D Cameron, Thomas H Marwick, Dennis T Wong

Abstract readComparative StudyLetter
In one paragraph

Article in JACC. Cardiovascular imaging, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Trial
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Evaluation of pericoronary adipose tissue attenuation on CT.The British journal of radiology · 2023
    Review
  18. Epicardial Adipose Tissue in Patients with Coronary Artery Disease: A Meta-Analysis.Journal of cardiovascular development and disease · 2022
    Review
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Nitesh Nerlekar
Yi-Wei Baey
Adam J Brown
Rahul G Muthalaly
Damini Dey
Balaji Tamarappoo
James D Cameron
Thomas H Marwick
Dennis T Wong

Funding

Automated quantitative CT imaging of epicardial adipose tissue and risk of cardiac eventsR01HL133616 · NHLBI · CEDARS-SINAI MEDICAL CENTER · PI DEY, DAMINI · 2016 to 2019
$2.6M
NHLBI NIH HHS R01 HL133616
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.

Indexed as

EchocardiographyImaging, Three-DimensionalHumansIntra-Abdominal FatMultidetector Computed TomographyObserver VariationPericardiumPredictive Value of TestsReproducibility of Results

Identifiers

PMID29361482
PMCPMC6035093

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.