Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29361332›Full record

Trial reportThe Journal of allergy and clinical immunology2018

Safety and efficacy of immunotherapy with the recombinant B-cell epitope-based grass pollen vaccine BM32.

Verena Niederberger, Angela Neubauer, Philippe Gevaert, Mihaela Zidarn, Margitta Worm, Werner Aberer, Hans Jørgen Malling, Oliver Pfaar, Ludger Klimek, Wolfgang Pfützner and 13 more

Abstract readMulticenter StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in The Journal of allergy and clinical immunology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 51 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
51citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

51 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Recent advances in allergen immunotherapy.Chinese medical journal · 2026
    Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Allergenic Activity of Individual Cat Allergen Molecules.International journal of molecular sciences · 2023
    Article
  18. Peptide immunotherapy for aeroallergens.Allergy and asthma proceedings · 2023
    Article
  19. Allergen immunotherapy: past, present and future.Nature reviews. Immunology · 2023
    Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

23 authors.

Verena NiederbergerDepartment of Otorhinolaryngology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
Angela NeubauerBiomay AG, Vienna, Austria.
Philippe GevaertDepartment Otorhinolaryngology, Ghent University Hospital, Ghent, Belgium.
Mihaela ZidarnUniversity Clinic of Respiratory and Allergic Diseases, Golnik, Slovenia.
Margitta WormAllergy Center, Charité, Berlin, Germany.
Werner AbererDepartment of Dermatology and Venerology, Medical University Graz, Graz, Austria.
Hans Jørgen MallingAllergy Clinic Copenhagen University Hospital, Gentofte, Denmark.
Oliver PfaarCenter for Rhinology/Allergology, Wiesbaden, Germany; Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, Universitätsmedizin Mannheim, Medical Faculty Mannheim, Heidelberg University, Mannheim, Germany.
Ludger KlimekCenter for Rhinology/Allergology, Wiesbaden, Germany.
Wolfgang PfütznerDepartment of Dermatology and Allergology, Medical Center Giessen and Marburg GmbH, Marburg, Germany.
Johannes RingDepartment of Dermatology and Allergy Biederstein, Technical University Munich (TUM) and ZAUM-Center of Allergy and Environment, Munich, Germany.
Ulf DarsowDepartment of Dermatology and Allergy Biederstein, Technical University Munich (TUM) and ZAUM-Center of Allergy and Environment, Munich, Germany.
Natalija NovakClinic for Dermatology and Allergology, University of Bonn, Bonn, Germany.
Roy Gerth van WijkDepartment of Internal Medicine, Erasmus Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Julia Eckl-DornaDepartment of Otorhinolaryngology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
Margarete Focke-TejklDivision of Immunopathology, Department of Pathophysiology and Allergy Research, Medical University Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
Milena WeberDivision of Immunopathology, Department of Pathophysiology and Allergy Research, Medical University Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
Hans-Helge MüllerInstitute for Medical Information Technology, Biometrics and Epidemiology, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität, Munich, and the Institute for Medical Biometry and Epidemiology, Philipps-University, Marburg, Germany.
Joachim KlingerSynteractHCR Deutschland GmbH, Munich, Germany.
Frank StolzBiomay AG, Vienna, Austria.
Nora BreitBiomay AG, Vienna, Austria.
Rainer HenningBiomay AG, Vienna, Austria.
Rudolf ValentaDivision of Immunopathology, Department of Pathophysiology and Allergy Research, Medical University Vienna, Vienna, Austria; NRC Institute of Immunology FMBA of Russia, Moscow. Electronic address: rudolf.valenta@meduniwien.ac.at.

Funding

Austrian Science Fund FWF F 4605
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundBM32 is a grass pollen allergy vaccine based on recombinant fusion proteins consisting of nonallergenic peptides from the IgE-binding sites of the 4 major grass pollen allergens and the hepatitis B preS protein.

objectiveWe sought to study the safety and clinical efficacy of immunotherapy (allergen immunotherapy) with BM32 in patients with grass pollen-induced rhinitis and controlled asthma.

methodsA double-blind, placebo-controlled, multicenter allergen immunotherapy field study was conducted for 2 grass pollen seasons. After a baseline season, subjects (n = 181) were randomized and received 3 preseasonal injections of either placebo (n = 58) or a low dose (80 μg, n = 60) or high dose (160 μg, n = 63) of BM32 in year 1, respectively, followed by a booster injection in autumn. In the second year, all actively treated subjects received 3 preseasonal injections of the BM32 low dose, and placebo-treated subjects continued with placebo. Clinical efficacy was assessed by using combined symptom medication scores, visual analog scales, Rhinoconjunctivitis Quality of Life Questionnaires, and asthma symptom scores. Adverse events were graded according to the European Academy of Allergy and Clinical Immunology. Allergen-specific antibodies were determined by using ELISA, ImmunoCAP, and ImmunoCAP ISAC.

resultsAlthough statistical significance regarding the primary end point was not reached, BM32-treated subjects, when compared with placebo-treated subjects, showed an improvement regarding symptom medication, visual analog scale, Rhinoconjunctivitis Quality of Life Questionnaire, and asthma symptom scores in both treatment years. This was accompanied by an induction of allergen-specific IgG without induction of allergen-specific IgE and a reduction in the seasonally induced increase in allergen-specific IgE levels in year 2. In the first year, more grade 2 reactions were observed in the active (n = 6) versus placebo (n = 1) groups, whereas there was almost no difference in the second year.

conclusionsInjections of BM32 induced allergen-specific IgG, improved clinical symptoms of seasonal grass pollen allergy, and were well tolerated.

Indexed as

AdolescentAdultAllergensDesensitization, ImmunologicDouble-Blind MethodEpitopes, B-LymphocyteFemaleHepatitis B Surface AntigensHumansMaleMiddle AgedPlacebo EffectPoaceaePollenProtein PrecursorsRhinitis, Allergic, SeasonalAllergensEpitopes, B-LymphocyteHepatitis B Surface AntigensProtein PrecursorsVaccinesallergenallergen immunotherapyAllergyB-cell epitope–based immunotherapyclinical trialefficacygrass pollen allergyhypoallergenicrecombinant allergensafety

Identifiers

PMID29361332
PMCPMC6392176

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.