Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29361215›Full record

ArticleJournal of chemical information and modeling2018

ATPbind: Accurate Protein-ATP Binding Site Prediction by Combining Sequence-Profiling and Structure-Based Comparisons.

Jun Hu, Yang Li, Yang Zhang, Dong-Jun Yu

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of chemical information and modeling, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 32 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
32citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

32 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. AScience advances · 2025
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. CombinedACS omega · 2023
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Jun HuSchool of Computer Science and Engineering, Nanjing University of Science and Technology , Xiaolingwei 200, Nanjing, 210094, P. R. China.
Yang LiSchool of Computer Science and Engineering, Nanjing University of Science and Technology , Xiaolingwei 200, Nanjing, 210094, P. R. China.
Yang ZhangDepartment of Computational Medicine and Bioinformatics, University of Michigan , 100 Washtenaw, Ann Arbor, Michigan 48109-2218, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-2739-1916
Dong-Jun YuSchool of Computer Science and Engineering, Nanjing University of Science and Technology , Xiaolingwei 200, Nanjing, 210094, P. R. China.ORCID 0000-0002-6786-8053

Funding

I-TASSER based atomic-level protein structure predictionR01GM083107 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI ZHANG, YANG · 2008 to 2019
$3.5M
Template-based docking refinement approach to protein-protein structure modelingR01GM116960 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI ZHANG, YANG · 2016 to 2019
$1.4M
NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM083107NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM116960
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Protein-ATP interactions are ubiquitous in a wide variety of biological processes. Correctly locating ATP binding sites from protein information is an important but challenging task for protein function annotation and drug discovery. However, there is no method that can optimally identify ATP binding sites for different proteins. In this study, we report a new composite predictor, ATPbind, for ATP binding sites by integrating the outputs of two template-based predictors (i.e., S-SITE and TM-SITE) and three discriminative sequence-driven features of proteins: position specific scoring matrix, predicted secondary structure, and predicted solvent accessibility. In ATPbind, we assembled multiple support vector machines (SVMs) based on a random undersampling technique to cope with the serious imbalance phenomenon between the numbers of ATP binding sites and of non-ATP binding sites. We also constructed a new gold-standard benchmark data set consisting of 429 ATP binding proteins from the PDB database to evaluate and compare the proposed ATPbind with other existing predictors. Starting from a query sequence and predicted I-TASSER models, ATPbind can achieve an average accuracy of 72%, covering 62% of all ATP binding sites while achieving a Matthews correlation coefficient value that is significantly higher than that of other state-of-the-art predictors.

Indexed as

Support Vector MachineAdenosine TriphosphateBinding SitesDatabases, ProteinProteinsProtein Structure, SecondarySolventsAdenosine TriphosphateProteinsSolvents

Identifiers

PMID29361215
PMCPMC5963530

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.