Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29361175›Full record

ArticleJournal of the National Cancer Institute2018

Intratumor Heterogeneity of the Estrogen Receptor and the Long-term Risk of Fatal Breast Cancer.

Linda S Lindström, Christina Yau, Kamila Czene, Carlie K Thompson, Katherine A Hoadley, Laura J Van't Veer, Ron Balassanian, John W Bishop, Philip M Carpenter, Yunn-Yi Chen and 12 more

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of the National Cancer Institute, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 66 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
66citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
1.9field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

66 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 85 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Guideline
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Trial
  9. Twenty-Year Benefit From Adjuvant Goserelin and Tamoxifen in Premenopausal Patients With Breast Cancer in a Controlled Randomized Clinical Trial.Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology · 2022
    Trial
  10. Trial
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

6 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

22 authors at 9 institutions in 2 countries.

Linda S LindströmDepartment of Biosciences and Nutrition, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.
Christina YauDepartment of Surgery, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA.
Kamila CzeneDepartment of Medical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.
Carlie K ThompsonDepartment of Surgery, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA.
Katherine A HoadleyDepartment of Genetics, Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC.
Laura J Van't VeerDepartment of Pathology, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA.
Ron BalassanianDepartment of Pathology, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA.
John W BishopCenter for Comparative Medicine, Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, University of California Davis, Davis, CA.
Philip M CarpenterDepartment of Pathology, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA.
Yunn-Yi ChenDepartment of Pathology, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA.
Brian DatnowDepartment of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, CA.
Farnaz HastehDepartment of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, CA.
Gregor KringsDepartment of Pathology, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA.
Fritz LinDepartment of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, University of California Irvine, Irvine, CA.
Yanhong ZhangCenter for Comparative Medicine, Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, University of California Davis, Davis, CA.
Bo NordenskjöldDepartment of Clinical and Experimental Medicine and Department of Oncology, Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden.
Olle StålDepartment of Clinical and Experimental Medicine and Department of Oncology, Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden.
Christopher C BenzDepartment of Surgery, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA.
Tommy FornanderDepartment of Oncology-Pathology, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.
Alexander D BorowskyCenter for Comparative Medicine, Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, University of California Davis, Davis, CA.
Laura J EssermanDepartment of Surgery, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA.
STO Trialists Group
University of California, San Francisco · USKarolinska Institutet · SEUniversity of California, Davis · USBuck Institute for Research on Aging · USLinköping University · SEUniversity of California, San Diego · USUniversity of California, Irvine · USUniversity of North Carolina at Chapel Hill · USUniversity of Southern California · US

Funding

Virology Research Program (Program 4)P30CA016086 · NCI · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI David Darr · 1985 to 2026
$201.5M
NCI NIH HHS P30 CA016086
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Breast cancer patients with estrogen receptor (ER)-positive disease have a continuous long-term risk for fatal breast cancer, but the biological factors influencing this risk are unknown. We aimed to determine whether high intratumor heterogeneity of ER predicts an increased long-term risk (25 years) of fatal breast cancer. Methods: The STO-3 trial enrolled 1780 postmenopausal lymph node-negative breast cancer patients randomly assigned to receive adjuvant tamoxifen vs not. The fraction of cancer cells for each ER intensity level was scored by breast cancer pathologists, and intratumor heterogeneity of ER was calculated using Rao's quadratic entropy and categorized into high and low heterogeneity using a predefined cutoff at the second tertile (67%). Long-term breast cancer-specific survival analyses by intra-tumor heterogeneity of ER were performed using Kaplan-Meier and multivariable Cox proportional hazard modeling adjusting for patient and tumor characteristics. Results: A statistically significant difference in long-term survival by high vs low intratumor heterogeneity of ER was seen for all ER-positive patients (P < .001) and for patients with luminal A subtype tumors (P = .01). In multivariable analyses, patients with high intratumor heterogeneity of ER had a twofold increased long-term risk as compared with patients with low intratumor heterogeneity (ER-positive: hazard ratio [HR] = 1.98, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.31 to 3.00; luminal A subtype tumors: HR = 2.43, 95% CI = 1.18 to 4.99). Conclusions: Patients with high intratumor heterogeneity of ER had an increased long-term risk of fatal breast cancer. Interestingly, a similar long-term risk increase was seen in patients with luminal A subtype tumors. Our findings suggest that intratumor heterogeneity of ER is an independent long-term prognosticator with potential to change clinical management, especially for patients with luminal A tumors.

Indexed as

AgedAntineoplastic Agents, HormonalBreast NeoplasmsChemotherapy, AdjuvantFemaleHumansMiddle AgedNeoplasm GradingRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicReceptors, EstrogenRegistriesRetrospective StudiesRisk FactorsSurvival AnalysisSwedenTamoxifenAntineoplastic Agents, HormonalReceptors, EstrogenTamoxifen

Identifiers

PMID29361175
PMCPMC6037086
OpenAlexW2795184885

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.