Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29361118›Full record

ArticleLaboratory medicine2018

Assessment of Circulating Tumor Cells as a Predictive Biomarker of Histology in Women With Suspected Ovarian Cancer.

Emil Lou, Rachel I Vogel, Deanna Teoh, Spencer Hoostal, Aaron Grad, Matthew Gerber, Minnu Monu, Tomasz Lukaszewski, Jaai Deshpande, Michael A Linden and 1 more

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Laboratory medicine, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 19% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 30 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Molecular Management of High-Grade Serous Ovarian Carcinoma.International journal of molecular sciences · 2022
    Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. ESGO/ISUOG/IOTA/ESGE Consensus Statement on pre-operative diagnosis of ovarian tumors.International journal of gynecological cancer : official journal of the International Gynecological Cancer Society · 2021
    Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Emil LouDepartment of Medicine, Division of Hematology, Oncology and Transplantation, Minneapolis, Minnesota.
Rachel I VogelDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Minneapolis, Minnesota.
Deanna TeohDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Minneapolis, Minnesota.
Spencer HoostalDepartment of Medicine, Division of Hematology, Oncology and Transplantation, Minneapolis, Minnesota.
Aaron GradDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Minneapolis, Minnesota.
Matthew GerberDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Minneapolis, Minnesota.
Minnu MonuDepartment of Medicine, Division of Hematology, Oncology and Transplantation, Minneapolis, Minnesota.
Tomasz LukaszewskiDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Minneapolis, Minnesota.
Jaai DeshpandeDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Minneapolis, Minnesota.
Michael A LindenDepartment of Laboratory Medicine and Pathology, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota.
Melissa A GellerDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Minneapolis, Minnesota.
University of Minnesota · US

Funding

Women's CancerP30CA077598 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA TWIN CITIES · PI Jeffrey S. Miller · 1998 to 2026
$100.4M
University of Minnesota Clinical and Translational Science Institute (UMN CTSI)UL1TR000114 · NCATS · UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA · PI BLAZAR, BRUCE R · 2012 to 2015
$35.0M
University of Minnesota Clinical and Translational Science Institute (UMN CTSI)UL1TR002494 · NCATS · UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA · PI BLAZAR, BRUCE R, WEISDORF, DANIEL J · 2018 to 2022
$34.9M
Univ of Minnesota Buidling Interdisciplinary Research Careers in Women's HealthK12HD055887 · NICHD · UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA · PI ALLEN, SHARON S, BERGE, JERICA M · 2007 to 2023
$8.6M
NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR000114NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR002494NCI NIH HHS P30 CA077598NICHD NIH HHS K12 HD055887
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe clinical assessment of circulating tumor cells (CTCs) as a blood-based biomarker is FDA-approved for use in breast, colorectal, and prostate cancers. The objective of this prospective clinical study was to determine whether pretreatment CTCs are a useful diagnostic biomarker in women with complex pelvic masses.

methodsWhole blood was collected from 49 women with newly diagnosed pelvic masses. The presence of CTCs was compared between women with and without ovarian cancer histopathologic diagnosis after surgery using a Chi-squared test.

resultsCTCs were absent in those with benign disease (0/14), present in 17% (5/29) of patients with a histologic diagnosis of ovarian carcinoma, and present in 80% (4/5) of patients with ovarian metastases from other cancers (P = 0.001). All 5 women with ovarian cancer who had CTCs present presented stage III or IV of the disease (P = 0.13).

conclusionsCTCs were more prevalent in patients with metastases to the ovary than in primary ovarian carcinomas.

Indexed as

Neoplastic Cells, CirculatingAdultBiomarkersFemaleHumansMiddle AgedOvarian NeoplasmsProspective StudiesBiomarkers

Identifiers

PMID29361118
PMCPMC6251585
OpenAlexW2792056780

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.