ArticleAnnals of botany2018
Diel pattern of floral scent emission matches the relative importance of diurnal and nocturnal pollinators in populations of Gymnadenia conopsea.
Article in Annals of botany, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
14 citing papers in PubMed.
- DeceptiveFrontiers in plant science · 2025Article
- Exploring geography and evolutionary history as drivers of variation in floral scent chemistry in western sessile-flowered Trillium using parsimony-constrained phylogenetics.Annals of botany · 2024Article
- SCARECROW-like GRAS protein PES positively regulates petunia floral scent production.Plant physiology · 2023Article
- Developmental and temporal changes in petunia petal transcriptome reveal scent-repressing plant-specific RING-kinase-WD40 protein.Frontiers in plant science · 2023Article
- Measuring, comparing and interpreting phenotypic selection on floral scent.Journal of evolutionary biology · 2022Article
- Trade-off mitigation: a conceptual framework for understanding floral adaptation in multispecies interactions.Biological reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Society · 2021Article
- Floral Scent Evolution in the GenusPlants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021Article
- Evolution of floral scent in relation to self-incompatibility and capacity for autonomous self-pollination in the perennial herb Arabis alpina.Annals of botany · 2021Article
- The neuroecology of insect-plant interactions: the importance of physiological state and sensory integration.Current opinion in insect science · 2020Review
- Diel scent and nectar rhythms of an African orchid in relation to bimodal activity patterns of hawkmoth pollinators.Annals of botany · 2020Article
- Divergent selection on flowering phenology but not on floral morphology between two closely related orchids.Ecology and evolution · 2020Article
- Floral Scent Composition and Fine-Scale Timing in Two Moth-Pollinated HawaiianFrontiers in plant science · 2020Article
- Phenotypic plasticity of floral volatiles in response to increasing drought stress.Annals of botany · 2019Article
- Floral scent in a sexually deceptive Ophrys orchid: from headspace collections to solvent extractions.Plant signaling & behavior · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background and Aims: Floral scent is considered an integral component of pollination syndromes, and its composition and timing of emission are thus expected to match the main pollinator type and time of activity. While floral scent differences among plant species with different pollination systems can be striking, studies on intraspecific variation are sparse, which limits our understanding of the role of pollinators in driving scent divergence. Methods: Here, we used dynamic headspace sampling to quantify floral scent emission and composition during the day and at night in the natural habitat of six Scandinavian populations of the fragrant orchid Gymnadenia conopsea. We tested whether diel scent emission and composition match pollinator type by comparing four populations in southern Sweden, where nocturnal pollinators are more important for plant reproductive success than are diurnal pollinators, with two populations in central Norway, where the opposite is true. To determine to what extent scent patterns quantified in the field reflected plasticity, we also measured scent emission in a common growth chamber environment. Key Results: Both scent composition and emission rates differed markedly between day and night, but only the latter varied significantly among populations. The increase in scent emission rate at night was considerably stronger in the Swedish populations compared with the Norwegian populations. These patterns persisted when plants were transferred to a common environment, suggesting a genetic underpinning of the scent variation. Conclusions: The results are consistent with a scenario where spatial variation in relative importance of nocturnal and diurnal pollinators has resulted in selection for different scent emission rhythms. Our study highlights the importance of adding a characterization of diel variation of scent emission rates to comparative studies of floral scent, which so far have often focused on scent composition only.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.