Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29360925›Full record

ArticleAnnals of oncology : official journal of the European Society for Medical Oncology2018

Recurrent hyperactive ESR1 fusion proteins in endocrine therapy-resistant breast cancer.

R J Hartmaier, S E Trabucco, N Priedigkeit, J H Chung, C A Parachoniak, P Vanden Borre, S Morley, M Rosenzweig, L M Gay, M E Goldberg and 29 more

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Annals of oncology : official journal of the European Society for Medical Oncology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 78 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
78citing papers in PubMed
10.7field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

78 citing papers in PubMed, 103 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. ESR1 fusions in breast cancer: functions, mechanisms and therapeutic opportunities.Translational breast cancer research : a journal focusing on translational research in breast cancer · 2026
    Review
  10. Article
  11. eIF4A controls translation of estrogen receptor alpha and is a therapeutic target in advanced breast cancer.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2025
    Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Androgen receptor and estrogen receptor variants in prostate and breast cancers.The Journal of steroid biochemistry and molecular biology · 2024
    Review
  20. Article

18 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

39 authors at 13 institutions in 3 countries.

R J HartmaierFoundation Medicine Inc., Cambridge; Department of Pharmacology and Chemical Biolog, UPMC Hillman Cancer Center, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, USA; Women's Cancer Research Center, Magee-Women's Research Institute, Pittsburgh, USA. Electronic address: leeav@upmc.edu.
S E TrabuccoFoundation Medicine Inc., Cambridge.
N PriedigkeitDepartment of Pharmacology and Chemical Biolog, UPMC Hillman Cancer Center, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, USA; Women's Cancer Research Center, Magee-Women's Research Institute, Pittsburgh, USA.
J H ChungFoundation Medicine Inc., Cambridge.
C A ParachoniakFoundation Medicine Inc., Cambridge.
P Vanden BorreFoundation Medicine Inc., Cambridge.
S MorleyFoundation Medicine Inc., Cambridge.
M RosenzweigFoundation Medicine Inc., Cambridge.
L M GayFoundation Medicine Inc., Cambridge.
M E GoldbergFoundation Medicine Inc., Cambridge.
J SuhFoundation Medicine Inc., Cambridge.
S M AliFoundation Medicine Inc., Cambridge.
J RossFoundation Medicine Inc., Cambridge.
B Leyland-JonesDepartment of Molecular and Experimental Medicine, Avera Cancer Institute, Sioux Falls, USA.
B YoungDepartment of Molecular and Experimental Medicine, Avera Cancer Institute, Sioux Falls, USA.
C WilliamsDepartment of Molecular and Experimental Medicine, Avera Cancer Institute, Sioux Falls, USA.
B ParkSidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center, Johns Hopkins, Baltimore, USA.
M TsaiMinnesota Oncology, Minneapolis, USA.
B HaleyUT Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, USA.
J PegueroOncology Consultants Research Department, Houston, USA.
R D CallahanUCLA Medical Center, Santa Monica, USA.
I SachelarieCarlisle Regional Medical Center, Carlisle, USA.
J ChoNew Bern Cancer Care, New Bern, USA.
J M AtkinsonWomen's Cancer Research Center, Magee-Women's Research Institute, Pittsburgh, USA.
A BahreiniWomen's Cancer Research Center, Magee-Women's Research Institute, Pittsburgh, USA; Department of Human Genetics, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, USA; Department of Genetics and Molecular Biology, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan, Iran.
A M NagleDepartment of Pharmacology and Chemical Biolog, UPMC Hillman Cancer Center, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, USA; Women's Cancer Research Center, Magee-Women's Research Institute, Pittsburgh, USA.
S L PuhallaWomen's Cancer Research Center, Magee-Women's Research Institute, Pittsburgh, USA; Foundation Medicine Inc., Cambridge; Department of Molecular and Experimental Medicine, Avera Cancer Institute, Sioux Falls, USA.
R J WattersDepartment of Pharmacology and Chemical Biolog, UPMC Hillman Cancer Center, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, USA; Women's Cancer Research Center, Magee-Women's Research Institute, Pittsburgh, USA; Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, USA.
Z Erdogan-YildirimWomen's Cancer Research Center, Magee-Women's Research Institute, Pittsburgh, USA; Department of Human Genetics, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, USA.
L CaoWomen's Cancer Research Center, Magee-Women's Research Institute, Pittsburgh, USA; Central South University Xiangya School of Medicine, China.
S OesterreichDepartment of Pharmacology and Chemical Biolog, UPMC Hillman Cancer Center, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, USA; Women's Cancer Research Center, Magee-Women's Research Institute, Pittsburgh, USA.
A MathewDepartment of Medicine, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, USA.
P C LucasDepartment of Pathology, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, USA.
N E DavidsonFoundation Medicine Inc., Cambridge; Department of Molecular and Experimental Medicine, Avera Cancer Institute, Sioux Falls, USA.
A M BrufskyFoundation Medicine Inc., Cambridge; Department of Molecular and Experimental Medicine, Avera Cancer Institute, Sioux Falls, USA.
G M FramptonFoundation Medicine Inc., Cambridge.
P J StephensFoundation Medicine Inc., Cambridge.
J ChmieleckiFoundation Medicine Inc., Cambridge.
A V LeeDepartment of Pharmacology and Chemical Biolog, UPMC Hillman Cancer Center, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, USA; Women's Cancer Research Center, Magee-Women's Research Institute, Pittsburgh, USA.
Foundation Medicine (United States)Avera Health · USMagee-Womens Research Institute · USUniversity of Pittsburgh · USCancerCare · USCentral South University · CNHematology Oncology Consultants · USIsfahan University of Medical Sciences · IRMinnesota Oncology · USRegional Medical Center · USSidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center · USSouthwestern Medical Center · USUCLA Medical Center · US

Funding

VECTOR CORE FACILITYP30CA047904 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH AT PITTSBURGH · PI JOHN C. BYRD · 1988 to 2026
$158.0M
UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH CLINICAL AND TRANSLATIONAL SCIENCE INSTITUTE: BPCAUL1RR024153 · NCRR · UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH AT PITTSBURGH · PI REIS, STEVEN E · 2006 to 2011
$73.9M
University of Pittsburgh Clinical and Translational Science InstituteUL1TR000005 · NCATS · UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH AT PITTSBURGH · PI REIS, STEVEN E · 2012 to 2015
$50.8M
PREDOCTORAL TRAINING IN PHARMACOLOGICAL SCIENCEST32GM008424 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH AT PITTSBURGH · PI PAGANO, PATRICK J · 1994 to 2019
$3.4M
Transcriptomic profiling and functional characterization of fusion genes in recurrent ovarian cancerF30CA203095 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH AT PITTSBURGH · PI PRIEDIGKEIT, NOLAN · 2016 to 2018
$135k
NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR000005NCI NIH HHS F30 CA203095NCI NIH HHS P30 CA047904NCRR NIH HHS UL1 RR024153NIGMS NIH HHS T32 GM008424
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Estrogen receptor-positive (ER-positive) metastatic breast cancer is often intractable due to endocrine therapy resistance. Although ESR1 promoter switching events have been associated with endocrine-therapy resistance, recurrent ESR1 fusion proteins have yet to be identified in advanced breast cancer. Patients and methods: To identify genomic structural rearrangements (REs) including gene fusions in acquired resistance, we undertook a multimodal sequencing effort in three breast cancer patient cohorts: (i) mate-pair and/or RNAseq in 6 patient-matched primary-metastatic tumors and 51 metastases, (ii) high coverage (>500×) comprehensive genomic profiling of 287-395 cancer-related genes across 9542 solid tumors (5216 from metastatic disease), and (iii) ultra-high coverage (>5000×) genomic profiling of 62 cancer-related genes in 254 ctDNA samples. In addition to traditional gene fusion detection methods (i.e. discordant reads, split reads), ESR1 REs were detected from targeted sequencing data by applying a novel algorithm (copyshift) that identifies major copy number shifts at rearrangement hotspots. Results: We identify 88 ESR1 REs across 83 unique patients with direct confirmation of 9 ESR1 fusion proteins (including 2 via immunoblot). ESR1 REs are highly enriched in ER-positive, metastatic disease and co-occur with known ESR1 missense alterations, suggestive of polyclonal resistance. Importantly, all fusions result from a breakpoint in or near ESR1 intron 6 and therefore lack an intact ligand binding domain (LBD). In vitro characterization of three fusions reveals ligand-independence and hyperactivity dependent upon the 3' partner gene. Our lower-bound estimate of ESR1 fusions is at least 1% of metastatic solid breast cancers, the prevalence in ctDNA is at least 10× enriched. We postulate this enrichment may represent secondary resistance to more aggressive endocrine therapies applied to patients with ESR1 LBD missense alterations. Conclusions: Collectively, these data indicate that N-terminal ESR1 fusions involving exons 6-7 are a recurrent driver of endocrine therapy resistance and are impervious to ER-targeted therapies.

Indexed as

Antineoplastic Agents, HormonalBreast NeoplasmsDrug Resistance, NeoplasmEstrogen Receptor alphaFemaleHigh-Throughput Nucleotide SequencingHumansMutationNeoplasm MetastasisRecombinant Fusion ProteinsAntineoplastic Agents, HormonalESR1 protein, humanEstrogen Receptor alphaRecombinant Fusion Proteins

Identifiers

PMID29360925
PMCPMC5913625
OpenAlexW2794280643

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.