ArticlePloS one2018
Mobile tablet-based therapies following stroke: A systematic scoping review of administrative methods and patient experiences.
Article in PloS one, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
18 citing papers in PubMed.
- Portable Touchscreen Assessment of Motor Skill: A Registered Report of the Reliability and Validity of EDNA MoTap.Assessment · 2025Article
- Review
- Mobile Technology-Based Interventions for Stroke Self-Management Support: Scoping Review.JMIR mHealth and uHealth · 2023Article
- Technologies in Home-Based Digital Rehabilitation: Scoping Review.JMIR rehabilitation and assistive technologies · 2023Article
- Handheld Computer Devices to Support Clinical Decision-making in Acute Nursing Practice: Systematic Scoping Review.Journal of medical Internet research · 2023Article
- Sensing System for Plegic or Paretic Hands Self-Training Motivation.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Article
- Current clinical practice in managing somatosensory impairments and the use of technology in stroke rehabilitation.PloS one · 2022Article
- Using Large-Scale Sensor Data to Test Factors Predictive of Perseverance in Home Movement Rehabilitation: Optimal Challenge and Steady Engagement.Frontiers in neurology · 2022Article
- Experiences and needs of the caregivers of stroke survivors in Malaysia-A phenomenological exploration.Frontiers in neurology · 2022Article
- Technology-Dependent Rehabilitation Involving Action Observation and Movement Imagery for Adults with Stroke: Can It Work? Feasibility of Self-Led Therapy for Upper Limb Rehabilitation after Stroke.Stroke research and treatment · 2022Article
- Internet Access and Usage Among Stroke Survivors and Their Informal Caregivers: Cross-sectional Study.JMIR formative research · 2021Article
- An iPad application-based intervention for improving post-stroke depression symptoms in a convalescent rehabilitation ward: A pilot randomized controlled clinical trial protocol.Internet interventions · 2020Article
- Differences in factors influencing the use of eRehabilitation after stroke; a cross-sectional comparison between Brazilian and Dutch healthcare professionals.BMC health services research · 2020Article
- Physiotherapists' and occupational therapists' perspectives on information and communication technology in stroke rehabilitation.PloS one · 2020Article
- Functional measurement post-stroke via mobile application and body-worn sensor technology.mHealth · 2019Article
- Article
- Why the uptake of eRehabilitation programs in stroke care is so difficult-a focus group study in the Netherlands.Implementation science : IS · 2018Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
background and purposeStroke survivors are often left with deficits requiring rehabilitation to recover function and yet, many are unable to access rehabilitative therapies. Mobile tablet-based therapies (MTBTs) may be a resource-efficient means of improving access to timely rehabilitation. It is unclear what MTBTs have been attempted following stroke, how they were administered, and how patients experienced the therapies. The review summarizes studies of MTBTs following stroke in terms of administrative methods and patient experiences to inform treatment feasibility.
methodsArticles were eligible if they reported the results of an MTBT attempted with stroke participants. Six research databases were searched along with grey literature sources, trial registries, and article references. Intervention administration details and patient experiences were summarized.
resultsThe search returned 903 articles of which 23 were eligible for inclusion. Most studies were small, observational, and enrolled chronic stroke patients. Interventions commonly targeted communication, cognition, or fine-motor skills. Therapies tended to be personalized based on patient deficits using commercially available applications. The complexity of therapy instructions, fine-motor requirements, and unreliability of internet or cellular connections were identified as common barriers to tablet-based care.
conclusionsStroke patients responded positively to MTBTs in both the inpatient and home settings. However, some support from therapists or caregivers may be required for patients to overcome barriers to care. Feasibility studies should continue to identify the administrative methods that minimize barriers to care and maximize patient adherence to prescribed therapy regiments.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.