Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29360819›Full record

ArticleBritish journal of cancer2018

A core matrisome gene signature predicts cancer outcome.

Arseniy E Yuzhalin, Tomas Urbonas, Michael A Silva, Ruth J Muschel, Alex N Gordon-Weeks

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in British journal of cancer, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 74 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
74citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

74 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Systematic Review of Prognostic Gene Signature in Gastric Cancer Patients.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2020
    Pooled it
  2. Understanding and targeting the tumour matrisome.Nature reviews. Clinical oncology · 2026
    Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. The extracellular matrix protein EMILIN-1 impacts on the microenvironment by hampering gastric cancer development and progression.Gastric cancer : official journal of the International Gastric Cancer Association and the Japanese Gastric Cancer Association · 2024
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Critical functions of extracellular matrix in brain metastasis seeding.Cellular and molecular life sciences : CMLS · 2023
    Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article

14 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Arseniy E YuzhalinCRUK/MRC Oxford Institute for Radiation Oncology, Old Road Campus Research Building, Roosevelt Drive, Oxford OX3 7DQ, UK.
Tomas UrbonasDepartment of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, Oxford University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Old Road, Oxford OX3 7LE, UK.
Michael A SilvaDepartment of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, Oxford University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Old Road, Oxford OX3 7LE, UK.
Ruth J MuschelCRUK/MRC Oxford Institute for Radiation Oncology, Old Road Campus Research Building, Roosevelt Drive, Oxford OX3 7DQ, UK.
Alex N Gordon-WeeksCRUK/MRC Oxford Institute for Radiation Oncology, Old Road Campus Research Building, Roosevelt Drive, Oxford OX3 7DQ, UK.

Funding

Cancer Research UK 11563Cancer Research UK 20407
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAccumulating evidence implicates the tumour stroma as an important determinant of cancer progression but the protein constituents relevant for this effect are unknown. Here we utilised a bioinformatics approach to identify an extracellular matrix (ECM) gene signature overexpressed in multiple cancer types and strongly predictive of adverse outcome.

methodsGene expression levels in cancers were determined using Oncomine. Geneset enrichment analysis was performed using the Broad Institute desktop application. Survival analysis was performed using KM plotter. Survival data were generated from publically available genesets.

resultsWe analysed ECM genes significantly upregulated across a large cohort of patients with ovarian, lung, gastric and colon cancers and defined a signature of nine commonly upregulated genes. Each of these nine genes was considerably overexpressed in all the cancers studied, and cumulatively, their expression was associated with poor prognosis across all data sets. Further, the gene signature expression was associated with enrichment of genes governing processes linked to poor prognosis, such as EMT, angiogenesis, hypoxia, and inflammation.

conclusionsHere we identify a nine-gene ECM signature, which strongly predicts outcome across multiple cancer types and can be used for prognostication after validation in prospective cancer cohorts.

Indexed as

Gene ExpressionAdenocarcinomaBreast NeoplasmsCell HypoxiaColonic NeoplasmsComputational BiologyEpithelial-Mesenchymal TransitionEsophageal NeoplasmsExtracellular MatrixFemaleHumansInflammationKaplan-Meier EstimateLung NeoplasmsNeoplasmsNeovascularization, Pathologic

Identifiers

PMID29360819
PMCPMC5808042

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.