Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29360803›Full record

ReviewFoods (Basel, Switzerland)2018

Carbon Monoxide in Meat and Fish Packaging: Advantages and Limits.

Djamel Djenane, Pedro Roncalés

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Foods (Basel, Switzerland), 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Improved Functionality, Quality, and Shelf Life ofFoods (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Use of Algerian TypeFoods (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023
    Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Quality and Safety of Meat Products.Foods (Basel, Switzerland) · 2020
    Article
  12. Olive Leaves Extract from Algerian Oleaster (Foods (Basel, Switzerland) · 2018
    Article
  13. Quality and Safety of Meat Products.Foods (Basel, Switzerland) · 2018
    Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Djamel DjenaneLaboratory of Food Quality and Food Safety, Department of Food Science and Technology, University Mouloud Mammeri, P.O. Box 17, Tizi-Ouzou 15000, Algeria. djenane6@yahoo.es.ORCID 0000-0003-4050-4329
Pedro RoncalésLaboratory of Meat and Fish Technology, Department of Animal Production and Food Science, Faculty of Veterinary Sciences, University of Zaragoza, C/Miguel Servet, 177, 50013 Zaragoza, Spain. roncales@unizar.es.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Due to increased demands for greater expectation in relation to quality, convenience, safety and extended shelf-life, combined with growing demand from retailers for cost-effective extensions of fresh muscle foods' shelf-life, the food packaging industry quickly developed to meet these expectations. During the last few decades, modified atmosphere packaging (MAP) of foods has been a promising area of research, but much remains to be known regarding the use of unconventional gases such carbon monoxide (CO). The use of CO for meat and seafood packaging is not allowed in most countries due to the potential toxic effect, and its use is controversial in some countries. The commercial application of CO in food packaging was not then considered feasible because of possible environmental hazards for workers. CO has previously been reported to mask muscle foods' spoilage, and this was the primary concern raised for the prohibition, as this may mislead consumers. This review was undertaken to present the most comprehensive and current overview of the widely-available, scattered information about the use of CO in the preservation of muscle foods. The advantages of CO and its industrial limits are presented and discussed. The most recent literature on the consumer safety issues related to the use of CO and consumer acceptance of CO especially in meat packaging systems were also discussed. Recommendations and future prospects were addressed for food industries, consumers and regulators on what would be a "best practice" in the use of CO in food packaging. All this promotes high ethical standards in commercial communications by means of effective regulation, for the benefit of consumers and businesses in the world, and this implies that industrialized countries and members of their regulatory agencies must develop a coherent and robust systems of regulation and control that can respond effectively to new challenges.

Indexed as

best practiceCOmodified atmosphere packagingmuscle foodsregulationshelf-life

Identifiers

PMID29360803
PMCPMC5848116

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.