Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29360775›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of environmental research and public health2018

Faecal Pathogen Flows and Their Public Health Risks in Urban Environments: A Proposed Approach to Inform Sanitation Planning.

Freya Mills, Juliet Willetts, Susan Petterson, Cynthia Mitchell, Guy Norman

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of environmental research and public health, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Observational
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Freya MillsInstitute for Sustainable Futures, University of Technology Sydney, Level 10, UTS Building 10, 235 Jones Street, Ultimo, NSW 2007, Australia. freya.mills@uts.edu.au.
Juliet WillettsInstitute for Sustainable Futures, University of Technology Sydney, Level 10, UTS Building 10, 235 Jones Street, Ultimo, NSW 2007, Australia. juliet.willetts@uts.edu.au.
Susan PettersonWater & Health Pty Ltd., P.O. Box 648, Salamander Bay, NSW 2317, Australia. s.petterson@waterandhealth.com.au.
Cynthia MitchellInstitute for Sustainable Futures, University of Technology Sydney, Level 10, UTS Building 10, 235 Jones Street, Ultimo, NSW 2007, Australia. Cynthia.Mitchell@uts.edu.au.ORCID 0000-0001-9842-540X
Guy NormanWater and Sanitation for the Urban Poor, 10 Queen Street Place, London EC4R 1BE, UK. gnorman@wsup.com.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Public health benefits are often a key political driver of urban sanitation investment in developing countries, however, pathogen flows are rarely taken systematically into account in sanitation investment choices. While several tools and approaches on sanitation and health risks have recently been developed, this research identified gaps in their ability to predict faecal pathogen flows, to relate exposure risks to the existing sanitation services, and to compare expected impacts of improvements. This paper outlines a conceptual approach that links faecal waste discharge patterns with potential pathogen exposure pathways to quantitatively compare urban sanitation improvement options. An illustrative application of the approach is presented, using a spreadsheet-based model to compare the relative effect on disability-adjusted life years of six sanitation improvement options for a hypothetical urban situation. The approach includes consideration of the persistence or removal of different pathogen classes in different environments; recognition of multiple interconnected sludge and effluent pathways, and of multiple potential sites for exposure; and use of quantitative microbial risk assessment to support prediction of relative health risks for each option. This research provides a step forward in applying current knowledge to better consider public health, alongside environmental and other objectives, in urban sanitation decision making. Further empirical research in specific locations is now required to refine the approach and address data gaps.

Indexed as

CitiesSanitationFecesHumansPublic HealthRiskSewageSewagedecision makingfaecal wasteoptions assessmentpathogenspublic healthrisk assessmenturban sanitationwastewater

Identifiers

PMID29360775
PMCPMC5858256

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.