Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29360747›Full record

ReviewInternational journal of environmental research and public health2018

Groundwater Arsenic Contamination in the Ganga River Basin: A Future Health Danger.

Dipankar Chakraborti, Sushant K Singh, Mohammad Mahmudur Rahman, Rathindra Nath Dutta, Subhas Chandra Mukherjee, Shyamapada Pati, Probir Bijoy Kar

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in International journal of environmental research and public health, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 38 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
38citing papers in PubMed
14.5field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

38 citing papers in PubMed, 271 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Combined supplementation of selenium and silica boosts growth and yield of rice (Physiology and molecular biology of plants : an international journal of functional plant biology · 2025
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. AIMS neuroscience · 2024
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Protective efficacy ofToxicological research · 2022
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 6 institutions in 2 countries.

Dipankar ChakrabortiSchool of Environmental Studies, Jadavpur University, Kolkata 700032, India. dcsoesju@gmail.com.
Sushant K SinghVirtusa Corporation, Irvington, NJ 07111, USA. sushantorama@gmail.com.ORCID 0000-0001-6065-6050
Mohammad Mahmudur RahmanGlobal Centre for Environmental Remediation (GCER), The University of Newcastle, Callaghan Campus, Callaghan, NSW 2308, Australia. mahmud.rahman@newcastle.edu.au.ORCID 0000-0002-3426-5221
Rathindra Nath DuttaDepartment of Dermatology, Institute of Post Graduate Medical Education and Research, SSKM Hospital, Kolkata 700020, India. rndutta@gmail.com.
Subhas Chandra MukherjeeDepartment of Neurology, Medical College, Kolkata 700073, India. drscmukherjee@gmail.com.
Shyamapada PatiDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Calcutta National Medical College, Kolkata 700014, India. shyamapada_pati@rediffmail.com.
Probir Bijoy KarSurgical Oncologist, Barasat Cancer Research and Welfare Centre, Kolkata 700124, India. drpbkar@yahoo.co.in.
Calcutta National Medical College and Hospital · INInstitute of Post Graduate Medical Education and Research · INJadavpur University · INKPC Medical College and Hospital · INSaroj Gupta Cancer Centre & Research Institute · INUniversity of Newcastle Australia · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study highlights the severity of arsenic contamination in the Ganga River basin (GRB), which encompasses significant geographic portions of India, Bangladesh, Nepal, and Tibet. The entire GRB experiences elevated levels of arsenic in the groundwater (up to 4730 µg/L), irrigation water (~1000 µg/L), and in food materials (up to 3947 µg/kg), all exceeding the World Health Organization's standards for drinking water, the United Nations Food and Agricultural Organization's standard for irrigation water (100 µg/L), and the Chinese Ministry of Health's standard for food in South Asia (0.15 mg/kg), respectively. Several individuals demonstrated dermal, neurological, reproductive, cognitive, and cancerous effects; many children have been diagnosed with a range of arsenicosis symptoms, and numerous arsenic-induced deaths of youthful victims are reported in the GRB. Victims of arsenic exposure face critical social challenges in the form of social isolation and hatred by their respective communities. Reluctance to establish arsenic standards and unsustainable arsenic mitigation programs have aggravated the arsenic calamity in the GRB and put millions of lives in danger. This alarming situation resembles a ticking time bomb. We feel that after 29 years of arsenic research in the GRB, we have seen the tip of the iceberg with respect to the actual magnitude of the catastrophe; thus, a reduced arsenic standard for drinking water, testing all available drinking water sources, and sustainable and cost-effective arsenic mitigation programs that include the participation of the people are urgently needed.

Indexed as

RiversWater PollutionArsenicBangladeshDrinking WaterFood ChainGroundwaterHumansIndiaNepalSocioeconomic FactorsTibetWater Pollutants, ChemicalArsenicDrinking WaterWater Pollutants, Chemicalarseniccancerousdrinking waterGanga River basinhealth effectsmitigationsocial issues

Identifiers

PMID29360747
PMCPMC5858255
OpenAlexW2788536010

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.