Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29360544›Full record

ReviewBiochimica et biophysica acta. Reviews on cancer2018

Circulating tumor cell-derived organoids: Current challenges and promises in medical research and precision medicine.

Prakash P Praharaj, Sujit K Bhutia, Sunitha Nagrath, Rhonda L Bitting, Gagan Deep

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Biochimica et biophysica acta. Reviews on cancer, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 90 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
90citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

90 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Organoid technology in cancer research.Molecular biomedicine · 2026
    Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Unique Cohorts of Salivary Gland Cancer Cells as anJournal of maxillofacial and oral surgery · 2024
    Article
  19. Review
  20. Review

30 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Prakash P PraharajWake Forest Baptist Medical Center, Department of Cancer Biology, Winston-Salem, NC, United States; Department of Life Science, National Institute of Technology Rourkela, Odisha, India.
Sujit K BhutiaDepartment of Life Science, National Institute of Technology Rourkela, Odisha, India.
Sunitha NagrathDepartment of Chemical Engineering, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, United States; Biointerfaces Institute, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, United States.
Rhonda L BittingHematology and Oncology Department, United States; Wake Forest Baptist Comprehensive Cancer Center, United States.
Gagan DeepWake Forest Baptist Medical Center, Department of Cancer Biology, Winston-Salem, NC, United States; Wake Forest Baptist Comprehensive Cancer Center, United States; Department of Urology, Wake Forest Baptist Medical Center, Winston-Salem, NC, United States. Electronic address: gdeep@wakehealth.edu.

Funding

Wake Forest Clinical and Translational Science AwardUL1TR001420 · NCATS · WAKE FOREST UNIVERSITY HEALTH SCIENCES · PI ARD, JAMY D, FOLEY, KRISTIE L · 2015 to 2023
$32.3M
Label free microfluidic isolation, characterization and ex vivo expansion of CTCsR01CA208335 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI NAGRATH, SUNITHA · 2017 to 2021
$2.8M
High Throughput GO Chip isolation of Lung CTCs for Molecular Diagnosis and Drug TestingR33CA202867 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI NAGRATH, SUNITHA, RAMNATH, NITHYA · 2016 to 2018
$1.0M
Exosomes Promote Disease Aggressiveness in African American Prostate CancerR21CA199628 · NCI · WAKE FOREST UNIVERSITY HEALTH SCIENCES · PI DEEP, GAGAN · 2015 to 2016
$571k
National Cancer Institute R21CA199628-03S1NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR001420NCI NIH HHS R01 CA208335NCI NIH HHS R21 CA199628NCI NIH HHS R33 CA202867NIH HHS 1-R01-CA-208335-01-A1NIH HHS 5-R33-CA-202867-02
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Traditional 2D cell cultures do not accurately recapitulate tumor heterogeneity, and insufficient human cell lines are available. Patient-derived xenograft (PDX) models more closely mimic clinical tumor heterogeneity, but are not useful for high-throughput drug screening. Recently, patient-derived organoid cultures have emerged as a novel technique to fill this critical need. Organoids maintain tumor tissue heterogeneity and drug-resistance responses, and thus are useful for high-throughput drug screening. Among various biological tissues used to produce organoid cultures, circulating tumor cells (CTCs) are promising, due to relative ease of ascertainment. CTC-derived organoids could help to acquire relevant genetic and epigenetic information about tumors in real time, and screen and test promising drugs. This could reduce the need for tissue biopsies, which are painful and may be difficult depending on the tumor location. In this review, we have focused on advances in CTC isolation and organoid culture methods, and their potential applications in disease modeling and precision medicine.

Indexed as

AnimalsAntineoplastic AgentsBiomarkers, TumorBiomedical ResearchCell Culture TechniquesCell SeparationClinical Decision-MakingDrug Resistance, NeoplasmDrug Screening Assays, AntitumorHigh-Throughput Screening AssaysHumansNeoplasmsNeoplastic Cells, CirculatingOrganoidsPrecision MedicinePredictive Value of TestsAntineoplastic AgentsBiomarkers, TumorCancerCirculating tumor cellsOrganoidsPrecision medicine

Identifiers

PMID29360544
PMCPMC6054479

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.