Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29359873›Full record

ArticleThe European journal of neuroscience2018

Predicting age from cortical structure across the lifespan.

Christopher R Madan, Elizabeth A Kensinger

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The European journal of neuroscience, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 45 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
45citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

45 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Cortical complexity in eating disorders: a systematic review and qualitative synthesis.European archives of psychiatry and clinical neuroscience · 2026
    Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Christopher R MadanSchool of Psychology, University of Nottingham, University Park, Nottingham, NG7 2RD, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-3228-6501
Elizabeth A KensingerDepartment of Psychology, Boston College, Chestnut Hill, MA, USA.

Funding

How Emotion Affects Memory for Detail: Behavioral and Neuroimaging InvestigationsR01MH080833 · NIMH · BOSTON COLLEGE · PI KENSINGER, ELIZABETH ANN · 2008 to 2016
$2.8M
CIHR FRN‐146793NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH080833
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Despite interindividual differences in cortical structure, cross-sectional and longitudinal studies have demonstrated a large degree of population-level consistency in age-related differences in brain morphology. This study assessed how accurately an individual's age could be predicted by estimates of cortical morphology, comparing a variety of structural measures, including thickness, gyrification and fractal dimensionality. Structural measures were calculated across up to seven different parcellation approaches, ranging from one region to 1000 regions. The age prediction framework was trained using morphological measures obtained from T1-weighted MRI volumes collected from multiple sites, yielding a training dataset of 1056 healthy adults, aged 18-97. Age predictions were calculated using a machine-learning approach that incorporated nonlinear differences over the lifespan. In two independent, held-out test samples, age predictions had a median error of 6-7 years. Age predictions were best when using a combination of cortical metrics, both thickness and fractal dimensionality. Overall, the results reveal that age-related differences in brain structure are systematic enough to enable reliable age prediction based on metrics of cortical morphology.

Indexed as

Age FactorsLongevityAdolescentAdultAgedAged, 80 and overBrainBrain MappingCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHumansImage Processing, Computer-AssistedLongitudinal StudiesMachine LearningMagnetic Resonance ImagingMaleagingbrain morphologycortical complexityfractal dimensionalitygyrificationstructural MRI

Identifiers

PMID29359873
PMCPMC5835209

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.