ArticleJournal of feline medicine and surgery2018
Effectiveness of a bipolar vessel sealant device for ovariohysterectomy in cats with pyometra.
Article in Journal of feline medicine and surgery, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.
- Comparison of the efficacy and perioperative pain between vessel sealing and suture ligation for median celiotomy in canine ovariohysterectomy.Veterinary world · 2023Article
- Comparison of Two Radiofrequency Vessel-Sealing Device for Laparoscopic Ovariectomy in African Lionesses (Panthera Leo).Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2022Article
- Effectiveness of a bipolar vessel sealant device for ovariohysterectomy in cats with pyometra.Journal of feline medicine and surgery · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectivesThe objective was to describe the use of a bipolar vessel sealant device for complete ovariohysterectomy in cats (ie, removal of both the ovarian pedicle and the uterine body and vessels) and to report on the feasibility of ovariohysterectomy in cats with pyometra.
methodsCats with confirmed pyometra and whose owners agreed to the surgical procedure were prospectively included in the study. Ovaries were visualised and the vessel sealant device was used to coagulate and cut the suspensory ligament, the ovarian pedicle and the broad ligament up to the level of the uterine body. Once the uterine body was measured, it was grasped, coagulated and transected just proximal to the cervix using the vessel sealant device when its diameter was <0.9 cm. Immediate postoperative and short-term follow-up were evaluated by clinical examination.
resultsThirteen cases were initially included between November 2015 and February 2017. Three cases were subsequently excluded because of a uterine body diameter >0.9 cm. Of the 10 cats finally included, all were intact females, with a median age of 2.7 years (range 0.9-9 years). Median weight was 3.7 kg (range 2.6-6.7 kg). The median surgery time was 10.9 mins (range 9.8-15.2 mins). Median uterus diameter was 0.51 cm (range 0.45-0.64 cm) and median skin incision was 4.1 cm (range 3.6-5.1 cm). No complications during the procedures occurred in any patient. All cases were discharged from the hospital 1 day after surgery, without any abnormality. No complications were noted during the postoperative period. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: The findings suggest that the bipolar vessel sealant device used in this study is safe in performing ovariohysterectomy for pyometra in cats, when the uterine body is <0.9 cm in diameter, without short-term complications.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.