Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29359121›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in oncology2017

Radiobiological Optimization in Lung Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy: Are We Ready to Apply Radiobiological Models?

Marco D'Andrea, Silvia Strolin, Sara Ungania, Alessandra Cacciatore, Vicente Bruzzaniti, Raffaella Marconi, Marcello Benassi, Lidia Strigari

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in oncology, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
2.5field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Dose-Response of TLD-100 in the Dose Range Useful for Hypofractionated Radiotherapy.Dose-response : a publication of International Hormesis Society
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Marco D'AndreaLaboratory of Medical Physics and Expert Systems, Regina Elena National Cancer Institute, Rome, Italy.
Silvia StrolinLaboratory of Medical Physics and Expert Systems, Regina Elena National Cancer Institute, Rome, Italy.
Sara UnganiaLaboratory of Medical Physics and Expert Systems, Regina Elena National Cancer Institute, Rome, Italy.
Alessandra CacciatoreLaboratory of Medical Physics and Expert Systems, Regina Elena National Cancer Institute, Rome, Italy.
Vicente BruzzanitiLaboratory of Medical Physics and Expert Systems, Regina Elena National Cancer Institute, Rome, Italy.
Raffaella MarconiLaboratory of Medical Physics and Expert Systems, Regina Elena National Cancer Institute, Rome, Italy.
Marcello BenassiLaboratory of Medical Physics and Expert Systems, Regina Elena National Cancer Institute, Rome, Italy.
Lidia StrigariLaboratory of Medical Physics and Expert Systems, Regina Elena National Cancer Institute, Rome, Italy.
Expert System (Italy) · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Lung tumors are often associated with a poor prognosis although different schedules and treatment modalities have been extensively tested in the clinical practice. The complexity of this disease and the use of combined therapeutic approaches have been investigated and the use of high dose-rates is emerging as effective strategy. Technological improvements of clinical linear accelerators allow combining high dose-rate and a more conformal dose delivery with accurate imaging modalities pre- and during therapy. This paper aims at reporting the state of the art and future direction in the use of radiobiological models and radiobiological-based optimizations in the clinical practice for the treatment of lung cancer. To address this issue, a search was carried out on PubMed database to identify potential papers reporting tumor control probability and normal tissue complication probability for lung tumors. Full articles were retrieved when the abstract was considered relevant, and only papers published in English language were considered. The bibliographies of retrieved papers were also searched and relevant articles included. At the state of the art, dose-response relationships have been reported in literature for local tumor control and survival in stage III non-small cell lung cancer. Due to the lack of published radiobiological models for SBRT, several authors used dose constraints and models derived for conventional fractionation schemes. Recently, several radiobiological models and parameters for SBRT have been published and could be used in prospective trials although external validations are recommended to improve the robustness of model predictive capability. Moreover, radiobiological-based functions have been used within treatment planning systems for plan optimization but the advantages of using this strategy in the clinical practice are still under discussion. Future research should be directed toward combined regimens, in order to potentially improve both local tumor control and survival. Indeed, accurate knowledge of the relevant parameters describing tumor biology and normal tissue response is mandatory to correctly address this issue. In this context, the role of medical physicists and the AAPM in the development of radiobiological models is crucial for the progress of developing specific tool for radiobiological-based optimization treatment planning.

Indexed as

lung neoplasmsnormal tissue complication probabilityradiobiological modelingstereotactic body radiotherapytumor control probability

Identifiers

PMID29359121
PMCPMC5766682
OpenAlexW2781831987

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.