Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29359087›Full record

ArticleBiomedical optics express2018

Correction of an adding-doubling inversion algorithm for the measurement of the optical parameters of turbid media.

Paul Lemaillet, Catherine C Cooksey, Jeeseong Hwang, Heidrun Wabnitz, Dirk Grosenick, Lin Yang, David W Allen

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Biomedical optics express, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Spatial frequency domain Mueller matrix imaging.Journal of biomedical optics · 2022
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Paul LemailletNational Institute of Standards and Technology, 100 Bureau Drive, Gaithersburg, MD 20899, USA.
Catherine C CookseyNational Institute of Standards and Technology, 100 Bureau Drive, Gaithersburg, MD 20899, USA.
Jeeseong HwangNational Institute of Standards and Technology, 325 Broadway Street, Boulder, CO 80305, USA.
Heidrun WabnitzPhysikalisch-Technische Bundesanstalt (PTB), Abbestrasse 2-12, 10587 Berlin, Germany.
Dirk GrosenickPhysikalisch-Technische Bundesanstalt (PTB), Abbestrasse 2-12, 10587 Berlin, Germany.
Lin YangPhysikalisch-Technische Bundesanstalt (PTB), Abbestrasse 2-12, 10587 Berlin, Germany.
David W AllenNational Institute of Standards and Technology, 100 Bureau Drive, Gaithersburg, MD 20899, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We present broadband measurements of the optical properties of tissue-mimicking solid phantoms using a single integrating sphere to measure the hemispherical reflectance and transmittance under a direct illumination at the normal incident angle. These measurements are traceable to reflectance and transmittance scales. An inversion routine using the output of the adding-doubling algorithm restricted to the reflectance and transmittance under a direct illumination was developed to produce the optical parameters of the sample along with an uncertainty budget at each wavelength. The results for two types of phantoms are compared to measurements by time-resolved approaches. The results between our method and these independent measurements agree within the estimated measurement uncertainties.

Indexed as

(120.3150) Integrating spheres(170.7050) Turbid media(290.5820) Scattering measurements(300.0300) Spectroscopy(300.1030) Absorption

Identifiers

PMID29359087
PMCPMC5772589

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.