Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29359045›Full record

ReviewPain research and treatment2017

Chronic Pelvic Pain: Assessment, Evaluation, and Objectivation.

Maria Beatrice Passavanti, Vincenzo Pota, Pasquale Sansone, Caterina Aurilio, Lorenzo De Nardis, Maria Caterina Pace

Registry-linked trialOpen access · hybridAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Pain research and treatment, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05075551 (Analyzing the Brain Alterations of Acupuncture on Patients With Chronic Prostatitis/Chronic Pelvic Pain Syndrome Evaluated by fMRI), which is not on this map. Cited by 19 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
3.9field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05075551 naunknown statusnot on this mapstarted 2022, after this paper: background citation

Analyzing the Brain Alterations of Acupuncture on Patients With Chronic Prostatitis/Chronic Pelvic Pain Syndrome Evaluated by fMRI: Study Protocol for a Randomized Trial

TypeinterventionalSponsorShanghai University of Traditional Chinese MedicineRan2022 to 2023Enrolled500ConditionsChronic Prostatitis With Chronic Pelvic Pain SyndromeArmsAcupuncture, Sham acupuncture, fMRI scan
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 56 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Surgical interventions for the management of chronic pelvic pain in women.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2021
    Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Management of Gynaecological Chronic Pelvic Pain in the Emergency Setting- A Scoping Review.The Australian & New Zealand journal of obstetrics & gynaecology · 2026
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Gastrointestinal pain.Nature reviews. Disease primers · 2020
    Review
  19. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Maria Beatrice PassavantiDepartment of Woman, Child, General and Specialized Surgery, University of Campania L. Vanvitelli, Naples, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-9659-0847
Vincenzo PotaDepartment of Woman, Child, General and Specialized Surgery, University of Campania L. Vanvitelli, Naples, Italy.
Pasquale SansoneDepartment of Woman, Child, General and Specialized Surgery, University of Campania L. Vanvitelli, Naples, Italy.
Caterina AurilioDepartment of Woman, Child, General and Specialized Surgery, University of Campania L. Vanvitelli, Naples, Italy.
Lorenzo De NardisDepartment of Woman, Child, General and Specialized Surgery, University of Campania L. Vanvitelli, Naples, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-0310-3596
Maria Caterina PaceDepartment of Woman, Child, General and Specialized Surgery, University of Campania L. Vanvitelli, Naples, Italy.
University of Campania "Luigi Vanvitelli" · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Chronic Pelvic Pain (CPP) and Chronic Pelvic Pain Syndrome (CPPS) have a significant impact on men and women of reproductive and nonreproductive age, with a considerable burden on overall quality of life (QoL) and on psychological, functional, and behavioural status. Moreover, diagnostic and therapeutic difficulties are remarkable features in many patients. Therefore evaluation, assessment and objectivation tools are often necessary to properly address each patient and consequently his/her clinical needs. Here we review the different tools for pain assessment, evaluation, and objectivation; specific features regarding CPP/CPPS will be highlighted. Also, recent findings disclosed with neuroimaging investigations will be reviewed as they provide new insights into CPP/CPPS pathophysiology and may serve as a tool for CPP assessment and objectivation.

Identifiers

PMID29359045
PMCPMC5735788
OpenAlexW2769815984

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.