Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29358996›Full record

ArticlePrzeglad gastroenterologiczny2017

Comparative effectiveness of aggressive intravenous fluid resuscitation with lactated Ringer's solution and rectal indomethacin therapy in the prevention of pancreatitis after endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography: a double blind randomised controlled clinical trial.

Abdolrahim Masjedizadeh, Payman Fathizadeh, Nima Aghamohamadi

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Przeglad gastroenterologiczny, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.8field-weighted citation impact, top 23% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 16 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Abdolrahim MasjedizadehResearch Center for Infectious Diseases of Digestive System, Ahvaz Jundishapur University of Medical Sciences, Ahvaz, Iran.
Payman FathizadehDavid Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA, University, Los Angeles, California, USA.
Nima AghamohamadiResearch Center for Infectious Diseases of Digestive System, Ahvaz Jundishapur University of Medical Sciences, Ahvaz, Iran.
Ahvaz Jundishapur University of Medical Sciences · IRUniversity of California, Los Angeles · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionThere is growing evidence indicating the aggressive intravenous fluid resuscitation (IVFR) can decrease the rate of pancreatitis; however, to the best of our knowledge it has not been well studied in a post-endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (post-ERCP) setting.

aimTo compare the effects of aggressive IVFR and rectal indomethacin (RI) in preventing pancreatitis after ERCP. MATERIAL AND

methodsThis is a double blind randomised controlled clinical trial on 186 patients undergoing ERCP in Ahvaz, Iran. The inclusion criteria were ERCP for standard clinical indications such as choledocholithiasis, bile duct leak, and biliary obstruction. The IVFR group (

resultsPost-ERCP pancreatitis in IVFR, rectal indomethacin, and control groups occurred in 8 (12.9%), 16 (25.8%), and 20 (32.3%) patients (

conclusionsIntravenous fluid resuscitation with LRS was more effective in preventing post-ERCP pancreatitis in comparison to the rectal indomethacin and control group.

Indexed as

cholangiopancreatographyendoscopyindomethacininflammationpancreatitis

Identifiers

PMID29358996
PMCPMC5771451
OpenAlexW2773151650

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.