ArticleWorld journal of gastroenterology2018
Short- and long-term outcomes following laparoscopic
Article in World journal of gastroenterology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
19 citing papers in PubMed.
- Effect of Enhanced Recovery after Surgery with Integrated Traditional Chinese and Western Medicine on Postoperative Stress Response of Patients with Gastrointestinal Tumors.Computational and mathematical methods in medicine · 2022Trial
- Long-term survival outcomes of laparoscopic surgery in patients with colorectal cancer: A propensity score matching retrospective cohort study.Chinese journal of cancer research = Chung-kuo yen cheng yen chiu · 2024Article
- Prediction by a multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging-based radiomics signature model of disease-free survival in patients with rectal cancer treated by surgery.Frontiers in oncology · 2024Article
- Obesity: A risk factor for postoperative complications in laparoscopic surgery for colorectal cancer.Journal of minimal access surgery · 2024Article
- Short- and long-term results of openWorld journal of gastrointestinal surgery · 2023Article
- Article
- Article
- Comparison of prolonged postoperative ileus between laparoscopic right and left colectomy under enhanced recovery after surgery: a propensity score matching analysis.World journal of surgical oncology · 2022Review
- Propensity Score-Matched Analysis of Laparoscopic versus Open Surgery for Non-Metastatic Rectal Cancer.Asian Pacific journal of cancer prevention : APJCP · 2021Article
- Feasibility and outcomes of ERAS protocol in elective cT4 colorectal cancer patients: results from a single-center retrospective cohort study.World journal of surgical oncology · 2021Article
- Surgical treatment strategy for locally advanced colorectal cancer with abdominal wall invasion.Annals of translational medicine · 2021Article
- Comparison of the Effects of Laparoscopic and Open Surgery on Postoperative Acute Kidney Injury in Patients with Colorectal Cancer: Propensity Score Analysis.Journal of clinical medicine · 2021Article
- Applicability of minimally invasive surgery for clinically T4 colorectal cancer.Scientific reports · 2020Article
- Radiomics of rectal cancer for predicting distant metastasis and overall survival.World journal of gastroenterology · 2020Article
- Laparoscopic vs open colorectal cancer surgery in elderly patients: short- and long-term outcomes and predictors for overall and disease-free survival.BMC surgery · 2019Article
- Laparoscopic approach for left-sided T4 colon cancer is a safe and feasible procedure, compared to open surgery.Surgical endoscopy · 2019Article
- Outcomes of laparoscopic surgery for pathological T4 colon cancer.International journal of colorectal disease · 2019Article
- Laparoscopic surgery facilitates administration of adjuvant chemotherapy in locally advanced colon cancer: propensity score analyses.Cancer management and research · 2019Article
- Is there still a place for open surgery in the treatment strategy of rectal cancer?Przeglad gastroenterologiczny · 2018Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
aimTo evaluate the short-term and long-term outcomes following laparoscopic
methodsWe retrospectively analyzed the short- and long-term outcomes of proven pT4 colorectal cancer patients who underwent complete resection by laparoscopic or open surgery from 2006 to 2015 at Guangdong General Hospital.
resultsA total of 211 pT4 colorectal cancer patients were included in this analysis, including 101 cases in the laparoscopy (LAP) group and 110 cases in the open surgery (OPEN) group [including 15 (12.9%) cases of conversion to open surgery]. Clinical information (age, gender, body mass index, comorbidities, American Society of Anesthesiologists score,
conclusionLaparoscopy is safely used in the treatment of pT4 colorectal cancer while offering advantages of minimal invasiveness and faster recovery. Laparoscopy is able to achieve good oncologic outcomes similar to those of open surgery. We recommend that laparoscopy be carried out in experienced centers. It is still required to screen the appropriate cases for laparoscopic surgery, optimize the preoperative diagnosis process, and reduce the conversion rate. Multi-center, prospective, and large-sample studies are required to assess these issues.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.